![]() |
| Register | |||||||
| Digital Photography This is the forum for anything related to digital photography! Come on in and post your photography tips and pictures! |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools |
| | #12 (permalink) |
| More Than Meets The Eye Join Date: 22 Jan 2003 Location: KL/PJ Malaysia
Posts: 7,850
Reputation: 398 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Rep Power: 16 | yeah. i tested 50mm f1.8 again, same method as the above. exposure level indicator remains same f2.8 and f4.0 as well. at first i thought it could be aperture blade issue but if it was then the fact that exposure remains constant at wider angles already disproves the thought. |
| | |
| | #13 (permalink) |
| Administrator Join Date: 6 Oct 2002 Location: Maranello
Posts: 26,115
Reputation: 3845 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Rep Power: 70 | Sometimes, the aperture blade might not move correctly. But it shouldn't happen at wide open, because the aperture blade only closes when you use smaller aperture. Try something like F4 and F8 see if you get the same inconsistent exposure. If it doesn't, then it's simply because the lens' sweet spot is not at F2.8 |
| | |
| | #14 (permalink) |
| More Than Meets The Eye Join Date: 22 Jan 2003 Location: KL/PJ Malaysia
Posts: 7,850
Reputation: 398 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Rep Power: 16 | yup. regardless of the zoom distance, the aperture closes the same way. f2.8 is f2.8. now based on test, f2.8 works fine at other zoom range, exposure results same as f4.0 and / or higher. so i think we can conclude that the aperture blades work fine at f2.8, it's just that the lens doesn't capture light too well when f2.8@70mm. please do correct me if I'm wrong. anyway from what i see, the "problem" is easily fixed by upping the exposure by 1/3. |
| | |
| | #16 (permalink) |
| More Than Meets The Eye Join Date: 22 Jan 2003 Location: KL/PJ Malaysia
Posts: 7,850
Reputation: 398 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Rep Power: 16 | so far only 1 composition causes the contrast to appear. the rest like the toys and outdoor seem fine. i have no idea how to re-create the contrast issue. in that composition f2.8@70mm - washed out f4.0@70mm - fine f2.8@24mm - fine f4.0@24mm - fine contrast issue aside, yeah it works fine by just upping exposure by 1/3. |
| | |
| | #17 (permalink) |
| ARP Webmaster Join Date: 13 Oct 2002 Location: http://atpeaz.placidthoughts.com/
Posts: 8,487
Reputation: 1633 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Rep Power: 30 | It's just the lens performance at 2.8. I believe the glass of that lens isn't that big right? Quite compact lens in comparison to the canon's equivalent. That's why I'm still collecting money for the Nikkor one instead. Hehe The only way is for you to compensate via post processing and only use 2.8 when you really need it. |
| | |
| | #19 (permalink) | |
| Da Boss Join Date: 10 Oct 2002 Location: In front of my BenQ Joybook 7000 notebook!
Posts: 29,436
Reputation: 2830 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Rep Power: 63 | Quote:
__________________ Dr. Adrian Wong Tech ARP | Blog @ Tech ARP | The Free Trade Zone DYKT : The only offshore account I have is at the sand bank? Keep Tech ARP free! Visit our sponsors! We need PROGRAMMERS and TECHNICAL WRITERS! Contact us if you are a hot shot programmer or technical writer! My items for sale : 50x SD Card | Memory Stick PRO | Cyclone Energy Saver | Seiko SS watch | Tiger/Carlsberg beer jugs | Travel Speakers | Motorola V600 | Nokia N90 SOLD! | New Lowepro Mini Trekker AW Other items for sale @ the FTZ : Zalman CNPS9500 LED @ $20 | Zalman CNPS7700 Cu @ $20 | Zalman CNPS7000 Cu @ $20 | Swarovski bracelet watches | Dell 17" LCD | Hi-Fi speakers | English DIVX movies | HP LaserJet toners! | Office chairs | |
| | |
| | #20 (permalink) | ||
| More Than Meets The Eye Join Date: 22 Jan 2003 Location: KL/PJ Malaysia
Posts: 7,850
Reputation: 398 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Rep Power: 16 | Quote:
the Nikkor version $$$ oh. my friend bought a Nikkor 24-70 f2.8 ...... phew....... nearly can buy the EF 70-200 F2.8 L IS USM already. 82mm yes but size still a little smaller than it's non-3rd party counter parts. Quote:
the thing I'm more concerned about is the constrast issue. I have so far encountered 2 instances where it happens. so i just send it for warranty. | ||
| | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Sigma APO 200 - 500 mm F2.8 lens | Falcone | Digital Photography | 8 | 10th Mar 2007 12:28 PM |