Tech ARP Forums

Go Back   Tech ARP Forums > Others > Digital Photography
Register
FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read

Google Web www.techarp.com forums.techarp.com

Digital Photography This is the forum for anything related to digital photography! Come on in and post your photography tips and pictures!

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 9th Apr 2008, 09:47 PM   #11 (permalink)
Administrator
 
Chai's Avatar
 
Join Date: 6 Oct 2002
Location: Maranello
Posts: 26,115
Reputation: 3845
Chai has a reputation beyond reputeChai has a reputation beyond reputeChai has a reputation beyond reputeChai has a reputation beyond reputeChai has a reputation beyond reputeChai has a reputation beyond reputeChai has a reputation beyond reputeChai has a reputation beyond reputeChai has a reputation beyond reputeChai has a reputation beyond reputeChai has a reputation beyond repute
Rep Power: 70
Default

It simply shows this lens is not particularly good at wide open. Most lenses will show lack of contrast at wide open.
__________________
Chai (Contributor & Forum Admin)
http://www.techarp.com/
Chai is offline   Reply With Quote
SPONSOR
Old 9th Apr 2008, 09:56 PM   #12 (permalink)
More Than Meets The Eye
 
goldfries's Avatar
 
Join Date: 22 Jan 2003
Location: KL/PJ Malaysia
Posts: 7,850
Reputation: 398
goldfries is just really nicegoldfries is just really nicegoldfries is just really nicegoldfries is just really nice
Rep Power: 16
Default

yeah. i tested 50mm f1.8 again, same method as the above.

exposure level indicator remains same f2.8 and f4.0 as well.

at first i thought it could be aperture blade issue but if it was then the fact that exposure remains constant at wider angles already disproves the thought.
__________________

no computer specs | no photography gear list | no userbars | no quotes
goldfries is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th Apr 2008, 10:04 PM   #13 (permalink)
Administrator
 
Chai's Avatar
 
Join Date: 6 Oct 2002
Location: Maranello
Posts: 26,115
Reputation: 3845
Chai has a reputation beyond reputeChai has a reputation beyond reputeChai has a reputation beyond reputeChai has a reputation beyond reputeChai has a reputation beyond reputeChai has a reputation beyond reputeChai has a reputation beyond reputeChai has a reputation beyond reputeChai has a reputation beyond reputeChai has a reputation beyond reputeChai has a reputation beyond repute
Rep Power: 70
Default

Sometimes, the aperture blade might not move correctly. But it shouldn't happen at wide open, because the aperture blade only closes when you use smaller aperture. Try something like F4 and F8 see if you get the same inconsistent exposure. If it doesn't, then it's simply because the lens' sweet spot is not at F2.8
__________________
Chai (Contributor & Forum Admin)
http://www.techarp.com/
Chai is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th Apr 2008, 10:13 PM   #14 (permalink)
More Than Meets The Eye
 
goldfries's Avatar
 
Join Date: 22 Jan 2003
Location: KL/PJ Malaysia
Posts: 7,850
Reputation: 398
goldfries is just really nicegoldfries is just really nicegoldfries is just really nicegoldfries is just really nice
Rep Power: 16
Default

yup.

regardless of the zoom distance, the aperture closes the same way. f2.8 is f2.8.

now based on test, f2.8 works fine at other zoom range, exposure results same as f4.0 and / or higher.

so i think we can conclude that the aperture blades work fine at f2.8, it's just that the lens doesn't capture light too well when f2.8@70mm.

please do correct me if I'm wrong.

anyway from what i see, the "problem" is easily fixed by upping the exposure by 1/3.
__________________

no computer specs | no photography gear list | no userbars | no quotes
goldfries is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th Apr 2008, 10:20 PM   #15 (permalink)
Administrator
 
Chai's Avatar
 
Join Date: 6 Oct 2002
Location: Maranello
Posts: 26,115
Reputation: 3845
Chai has a reputation beyond reputeChai has a reputation beyond reputeChai has a reputation beyond reputeChai has a reputation beyond reputeChai has a reputation beyond reputeChai has a reputation beyond reputeChai has a reputation beyond reputeChai has a reputation beyond reputeChai has a reputation beyond reputeChai has a reputation beyond reputeChai has a reputation beyond repute
Rep Power: 70
Default

Even the contrast improves?
__________________
Chai (Contributor & Forum Admin)
http://www.techarp.com/
Chai is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th Apr 2008, 10:44 PM   #16 (permalink)
More Than Meets The Eye
 
goldfries's Avatar
 
Join Date: 22 Jan 2003
Location: KL/PJ Malaysia
Posts: 7,850
Reputation: 398
goldfries is just really nicegoldfries is just really nicegoldfries is just really nicegoldfries is just really nice
Rep Power: 16
Default

so far only 1 composition causes the contrast to appear. the rest like the toys and outdoor seem fine.

i have no idea how to re-create the contrast issue.

in that composition
f2.8@70mm - washed out
f4.0@70mm - fine
f2.8@24mm - fine
f4.0@24mm - fine

contrast issue aside, yeah it works fine by just upping exposure by 1/3.
__________________

no computer specs | no photography gear list | no userbars | no quotes
goldfries is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10th Apr 2008, 05:39 PM   #17 (permalink)
ARP Webmaster
 
peaz's Avatar
 
Join Date: 13 Oct 2002
Location: http://atpeaz.placidthoughts.com/
Posts: 8,487
Reputation: 1633
peaz has a brilliant futurepeaz has a brilliant futurepeaz has a brilliant futurepeaz has a brilliant futurepeaz has a brilliant futurepeaz has a brilliant futurepeaz has a brilliant futurepeaz has a brilliant futurepeaz has a brilliant futurepeaz has a brilliant futurepeaz has a brilliant future
Rep Power: 30
Default

It's just the lens performance at 2.8. I believe the glass of that lens isn't that big right? Quite compact lens in comparison to the canon's equivalent.

That's why I'm still collecting money for the Nikkor one instead. Hehe

The only way is for you to compensate via post processing and only use 2.8 when you really need it.
peaz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10th Apr 2008, 07:51 PM   #18 (permalink)
Administrator
 
Chai's Avatar
 
Join Date: 6 Oct 2002
Location: Maranello
Posts: 26,115
Reputation: 3845
Chai has a reputation beyond reputeChai has a reputation beyond reputeChai has a reputation beyond reputeChai has a reputation beyond reputeChai has a reputation beyond reputeChai has a reputation beyond reputeChai has a reputation beyond reputeChai has a reputation beyond reputeChai has a reputation beyond reputeChai has a reputation beyond reputeChai has a reputation beyond repute
Rep Power: 70
Default

It's definitely not small, comes with 82mm filter thread.
__________________
Chai (Contributor & Forum Admin)
http://www.techarp.com/
Chai is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10th Apr 2008, 10:52 PM   #19 (permalink)
Da Boss
 
Join Date: 10 Oct 2002
Location: In front of my BenQ Joybook 7000 notebook!
Posts: 29,436
Reputation: 2830
Adrian Wong has a reputation beyond reputeAdrian Wong has a reputation beyond reputeAdrian Wong has a reputation beyond reputeAdrian Wong has a reputation beyond reputeAdrian Wong has a reputation beyond reputeAdrian Wong has a reputation beyond reputeAdrian Wong has a reputation beyond reputeAdrian Wong has a reputation beyond reputeAdrian Wong has a reputation beyond reputeAdrian Wong has a reputation beyond reputeAdrian Wong has a reputation beyond repute
Rep Power: 63
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by goldfries View Post
so far only 1 composition causes the contrast to appear. the rest like the toys and outdoor seem fine.

i have no idea how to re-create the contrast issue.

in that composition
f2.8@70mm - washed out
f4.0@70mm - fine
f2.8@24mm - fine
f4.0@24mm - fine

contrast issue aside, yeah it works fine by just upping exposure by 1/3.
Well, upping the exposure should reduce the shutter speed, so it's not a workaround without any consequences. Better than increasing ISO though.
__________________
Dr. Adrian Wong
Tech ARP | Blog @ Tech ARP | The Free Trade Zone


DYKT : The only offshore account I have is at the sand bank?

Keep Tech ARP free! Visit our sponsors!

We need PROGRAMMERS and TECHNICAL WRITERS! Contact us if you are a hot shot programmer or technical writer!

My items for sale : 50x SD Card | Memory Stick PRO | Cyclone Energy Saver | Seiko SS watch | Tiger/Carlsberg beer jugs | Travel Speakers | Motorola V600 | Nokia N90 SOLD! | New Lowepro Mini Trekker AW

Other items for sale @ the FTZ : Zalman CNPS9500 LED @ $20 | Zalman CNPS7700 Cu @ $20 | Zalman CNPS7000 Cu @ $20 | Swarovski bracelet watches | Dell 17" LCD | Hi-Fi speakers | English DIVX movies | HP LaserJet toners! | Office chairs
Adrian Wong is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 15th Apr 2008, 03:42 AM   #20 (permalink)
More Than Meets The Eye
 
goldfries's Avatar
 
Join Date: 22 Jan 2003
Location: KL/PJ Malaysia
Posts: 7,850
Reputation: 398
goldfries is just really nicegoldfries is just really nicegoldfries is just really nicegoldfries is just really nice
Rep Power: 16
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by peaz View Post
It's just the lens performance at 2.8. I believe the glass of that lens isn't that big right? Quite compact lens in comparison to the canon's equivalent.

That's why I'm still collecting money for the Nikkor one instead. Hehe

The only way is for you to compensate via post processing and only use 2.8 when you really need it.
PP can't help the contrast issue. well, it shouldn't be in the first place. color then no choice la.

the Nikkor version $$$ oh. my friend bought a Nikkor 24-70 f2.8 ...... phew....... nearly can buy the EF 70-200 F2.8 L IS USM already.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chai View Post
It's definitely not small, comes with 82mm filter thread.
82mm yes but size still a little smaller than it's non-3rd party counter parts.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Adrian Wong View Post
Well, upping the exposure should reduce the shutter speed, so it's not a workaround without any consequences. Better than increasing ISO though.
well yeah, workaround with consequences.

the thing I'm more concerned about is the constrast issue. I have so far encountered 2 instances where it happens.

so i just send it for warranty.
__________________

no computer specs | no photography gear list | no userbars | no quotes
goldfries is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Sigma APO 200 - 500 mm F2.8 lens Falcone Digital Photography 8 10th Mar 2007 12:28 PM


All times are GMT +8. The time now is 12:23 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.1.0
Copyright © 1998-2007 Tech ARP. All rights reserved.