Plasma or LCD? - Page 2

peaz · 29th Jun 2008, 10:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PsYkHoTiK

I personally love the Sharp Aquos LCD HDTVs (they do full 1080p, have awesome colors and nice contrast - but my dad told me they are very $$$$$ in Malaysia). They are decently priced stateside (here).

Yup. THey are ()*)@(#_)!@#@((@(&@&&&#&#&&&$&&!@!!!@&#&# $$$$$$$$$$ here in M'sia.

So I just got the 32" Aquos LCD (not full HD) for my in-the-process-of-getting-ready condo unit... It's not a huge living hall anyway

Lacus · 29th Jun 2008, 06:47 PM

@chai,erm..it's cheap now at Carrefour Subang Jaya

..1.6k for 24 inch...32 around 2k?

Chai · 29th Jun 2008, 07:03 PM

But I rather get 24" Full HD for just 1.3k. It works perfectly with PS3 with Full HD.

mikegas · 29th Jun 2008, 07:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chai

But I rather get 24" Full HD for just 1.3k. It works perfectly with PS3 with Full HD.

24" is monitor size .. get at least 32"

Adrian Wong · 29th Jun 2008, 11:29 PM

Yeah, definitely LCD over plasma. If I do get a new HDTV, it will definitely be LCD.

As for 1080p, there's not much use for it unless you intend to hook it up to a PS3 / Blu-ray drive / HTPC. But it's a way to future-proof your purchase if you do not intend to upgrade a few years from now.

You might want to look into 100/120 Hz over the regular 50/60 Hz. For SD TV, which is what we mostly watch these days (yes, we are still THAT backward..

), the higher refresh rate makes a BIG difference. Once you go high-freq, you will NEVER go back to the lower refresh rates.

Chai · 29th Jun 2008, 11:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mikegas

24" is monitor size .. get at least 32"

Nah, there's a 42" Full HD downstairs, but I just enjoy gaming in my own room.

Adrian Wong · 29th Jun 2008, 11:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chai

Nah, there's a 42" Full HD downstairs, but I just enjoy gaming in my own room.

LICH! Those are not cheap!

mikegas · 1st Jul 2008, 02:01 PM

Ok .. now at the bother line between 40" Full HD or 40" 720p. The price difference is RM800.

Is there a huge difference running PS3 on Full HD compare to the non?

Btw, 100Hz is Rm1.6k extra from the Full HD

Chai · 1st Jul 2008, 03:39 PM

If you are using the TV as a PC monitor, then I think Full HD is better. If you are only using it for movies, then maybe 720p is good enough.

prijikn · 11th Jul 2008, 07:00 PM

Lcd is better, because it's easier to hook up to a computer.

29th Jun 2008, 06:47 PM	#12 (permalink)
Lacus Super Active Join Date: 28 Mar 2008 Location: Some gundam factory o.o Posts: 1,302 Reputation: 180 Rep Power: 4	@chai,erm..it's cheap now at Carrefour Subang Jaya ..1.6k for 24 inch...32 around 2k? __________________ GUNDAM 00[Intel Xeon E3110 E0 Stock\|Asus Rampage Maximus Formula (Rampage Bios Mod)\|Gigabyte HD4850 512MB GDDR3+T-Rad2\|4x2gb DDR2 1000Mhz OCZ SLI-Ready Edition\|Western Digital WD6400AAKS 640GB\|Creative X-FI XtremeMusic\|Creative Inspire P5800\|Silverstone Strider ST56F\|Acer X233H\|Keyboard=Microsoft Sidewinder X6\|Logitech MX518\|Lian Li PC-7YCF]

29th Jun 2008, 07:03 PM	#13 (permalink)
Chai Administrator Join Date: 6 Oct 2002 Location: Maranello Posts: 27,870 Reputation: 4630 Rep Power: 81	But I rather get 24" Full HD for just 1.3k. It works perfectly with PS3 with Full HD. __________________ Chai (Contributor & Forum Admin) http://www.techarp.com/

29th Jun 2008, 11:29 PM	#15 (permalink)
Adrian Wong Da Boss Join Date: 10 Oct 2002 Location: In front of my ASUS F8V notebook! Posts: 32,208 Reputation: 3531 Rep Power: 75	Yeah, definitely LCD over plasma. If I do get a new HDTV, it will definitely be LCD. As for 1080p, there's not much use for it unless you intend to hook it up to a PS3 / Blu-ray drive / HTPC. But it's a way to future-proof your purchase if you do not intend to upgrade a few years from now. You might want to look into 100/120 Hz over the regular 50/60 Hz. For SD TV, which is what we mostly watch these days (yes, we are still THAT backward.. ), the higher refresh rate makes a BIG difference. Once you go high-freq, you will NEVER go back to the lower refresh rates. __________________ Dr. Adrian Wong Tech ARP \| Blog @ Tech ARP \| The Free Trade Zone DYKT : The only offshore account I have is at the sand bank? We need PROGRAMMERS and TECHNICAL WRITERS! Contact us if you are a hot shot programmer or technical writer! My items for sale : 50x SD Card \| Memory Stick PRO \| Cyclone Energy Saver \| Seiko SS watch \| Tiger/Carlsberg beer jugs \| Travel Speakers \| Motorola V600 \| Nokia N90 SOLD! \| New Lowepro Mini Trekker AW Other items for sale @ the FTZ : Zalman CNPS9500 LED @ $20 \| Zalman CNPS7700 Cu @ $20 \| Zalman CNPS7000 Cu @ $20 \| Swarovski bracelet watches \| Dell 17" LCD \| Hi-Fi speakers \| English DIVX movies \| HP LaserJet toners! \| Office chairs

1st Jul 2008, 03:39 PM	#19 (permalink)
Chai Administrator Join Date: 6 Oct 2002 Location: Maranello Posts: 27,870 Reputation: 4630 Rep Power: 81	If you are using the TV as a PC monitor, then I think Full HD is better. If you are only using it for movies, then maybe 720p is good enough. __________________ Chai (Contributor & Forum Admin) http://www.techarp.com/

1st Jul 2008, 02:01 PM	#18 (permalink)
mikegas I'm a regular Join Date: 7 May 2008 Posts: 460 Reputation: 206 Rep Power: 4	Ok .. now at the bother line between 40" Full HD or 40" 720p. The price difference is RM800. Is there a huge difference running PS3 on Full HD compare to the non? Btw, 100Hz is Rm1.6k extra from the Full HD

11th Jul 2008, 07:00 PM	#20 (permalink)
prijikn Newbie Join Date: 11 Jul 2008 Posts: 2 Reputation: 0 Rep Power: 0	Lcd is better, because it's easier to hook up to a computer.