Vista's gaming performance has caught up to XP's level

ZuePhok · 12th May 2008, 02:42 PM

Gaming Performance: Windows Vista SP1 vs. XP SP3 - OS, Software & Networking by ExtremeTech

SOLID!

Lacus · 12th May 2008, 05:30 PM

Cool. Actually does that mean gaming in Vista has no different compare to XP (excluding running games in Dx10 Mode

)

Mac Daddy · 12th May 2008, 06:49 PM

Thats good news and glad I waited until SP1 came out ... curious why they didn't include X64 ... I am assuming those results are for the 32 bit version

Max_87 · 12th May 2008, 09:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lacus

Cool. Actually does that mean gaming in Vista has no different compare to XP (excluding running games in Dx10 Mode

)

I think the test results answered your question?

ZuePhok · 12th May 2008, 10:13 PM

Extremetech used Radeon HD 3870, so im not quite sure the performance of NV driver.

hjlavery · 13th May 2008, 12:00 PM

I would be interested to know how the Aero et al affect this at all, as I remember it made a huge difference to Vista's (and for that matter XP's) performance turning off the eye candy...

ZuePhok · 13th May 2008, 08:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hjlavery

I would be interested to know how the Aero et al affect this at all, as I remember it made a huge difference to Vista's (and for that matter XP's) performance turning off the eye candy...

nope it doesn't. i did a quick test before. the end results are about the same. with or without aero

Rraven · 14th May 2008, 06:54 AM

Good to know and see that they are working on catching Vista up with XP as far as gaming goes. Am currently working on putting a new box together and had been debating whether or not to move to Vista.

Mac Daddy · 14th May 2008, 08:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rraven

Good to know and see that they are working on catching Vista up with XP as far as gaming goes. Am currently working on putting a new box together and had been debating whether or not to move to Vista.

It has its pros and cons(teething pains) as any OS even XP when it was first introduced. I waited until SP1 came out before trying it and have found few driver or compatibility issues with it. The UAC is a stupid idea but easily disabled as well as some eye candy.

If your O/Cing Vista handles memory better but XP is still more stable

Chai · 14th May 2008, 08:35 AM

UAC is a good idea, especially for someone who doesn't really know what they are installing but extremely annoying. I finally understood how UAC works, and I enable it.

12th May 2008, 02:42 PM	#1 (permalink)
ZuePhok Hold me back! I can't stop posting!!! Join Date: 16 Dec 2002 Location: Floating Island Of Mandango Posts: 8,508 Reputation: 2724 Rep Power: 41	Vista's gaming performance has caught up to XP's level Gaming Performance: Windows Vista SP1 vs. XP SP3 - OS, Software & Networking by ExtremeTech SOLID! __________________ DYKT: Our DNA can expired? Thank god my science class wasn't taught by Pak Lah

12th May 2008, 06:49 PM	#3 (permalink)
Mac Daddy Pickin' Da Gitfiddle Join Date: 19 Nov 2007 Location: Canada Posts: 2,048 Reputation: 802 Rep Power: 11	Thats good news and glad I waited until SP1 came out ... curious why they didn't include X64 ... I am assuming those results are for the 32 bit version __________________

12th May 2008, 10:13 PM	#5 (permalink)
ZuePhok Hold me back! I can't stop posting!!! Join Date: 16 Dec 2002 Location: Floating Island Of Mandango Posts: 8,508 Reputation: 2724 Rep Power: 41	Extremetech used Radeon HD 3870, so im not quite sure the performance of NV driver. __________________ DYKT: Our DNA can expired? Thank god my science class wasn't taught by Pak Lah

13th May 2008, 12:00 PM	#6 (permalink)
hjlavery Just Started Join Date: 16 Apr 2008 Location: Sydney, AU Posts: 34 Reputation: 62 Rep Power: 0	I would be interested to know how the Aero et al affect this at all, as I remember it made a huge difference to Vista's (and for that matter XP's) performance turning off the eye candy... __________________ Laptop: Asus A6KM \| Gaming PC: Athlon X2 4400+, 2GB DDR2 800, 1TB hard disks, 19" Widescreen LCD, Logictec MX700 \| File Server: 9TB hard disks, Q6600, 2Gb CORSAIR DOMINATOR DDR2 XMS2-8500 RAM, GIGABYTE GA-EP35-DS4, Geforce 8500, Lian-Li v2100+

14th May 2008, 08:35 AM	#10 (permalink)
Chai Administrator Join Date: 6 Oct 2002 Location: Maranello Posts: 26,115 Reputation: 3845 Rep Power: 70	UAC is a good idea, especially for someone who doesn't really know what they are installing but extremely annoying. I finally understood how UAC works, and I enable it. __________________ Chai (Contributor & Forum Admin) http://www.techarp.com/

12th May 2008, 05:30 PM	#2 (permalink)
Lacus Active Join Date: 28 Mar 2008 Posts: 700 Reputation: 128 Rep Power: 2	Cool. Actually does that mean gaming in Vista has no different compare to XP (excluding running games in Dx10 Mode )

14th May 2008, 06:54 AM	#8 (permalink)
Rraven Just Started Join Date: 13 May 2008 Location: Blairsville, GA Posts: 50 Reputation: 129 Rep Power: 0	Good to know and see that they are working on catching Vista up with XP as far as gaming goes. Am currently working on putting a new box together and had been debating whether or not to move to Vista.