![]() | ![]() |
| Register | |||||||
| Graphics Cards & Displays Here's the place to discuss pixels and vertices! |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| Just Started Join Date: 25 Jun 2006 Location: Naples Florida
Posts: 40
Reputation: 0 ![]() Rep Power: 0 | Im actually looking into getting a new monitor for gaming, i dont really want to use an LCD considering i can feel the added latency to my mousing, and i love high refresh rates. The only problem with my current monitor is the frame fadeouts, on a black screen it takes about 20-30 frames for my mouse cursor to fade all the way out. I was wondering if anyone would know a good 21"+ CRT that i can 1024x768@100hz with, and not have the fading problem, and if not, whats the best LCD i should look into?
__________________ Dynamix Studio rig: Amd athlon x2 4800 | MSI K8N neo4 | 4x 1Gb OCz Gold GX | Radeon x850xt | Radeon 9000 pci | 2x 15" LCD's |1x 19" LCD 1x projector | 4x raid0 barracuda 250's | Digidesign protools HD|3 [$soundcard>$house] | ultrasone proline750 headphones -peak recording:32 simultaneous 32bit 96 khz wav tracks |
| | |
| SPONSOR |
| |
| | #3 (permalink) |
| Administrator Join Date: 6 Oct 2002 Location: Maranello
Posts: 27,884
Reputation: 4630 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Rep Power: 81 | I'm not sure if I'm going to recommend Dell monitors. Many people has complained about the color banding issue, even mine has it, but I can live with it. But colors are vibrant, much better than other LCD monitors I've used, including notebook LCDs. Refresh rate is not a problem for LCD anymore. So I'm pretty satisfied with Dell, high res, good colours, great price. |
| | |
| | #4 (permalink) |
| Just Started Join Date: 25 Jun 2006 Location: Naples Florida
Posts: 40
Reputation: 0 ![]() Rep Power: 0 | well i have a couple friends with some of the newer widescreen dell LCD's, and ive played games on their systems, and i really dont like the delays, even though its not a big delay it still annoys the crap out of me :\
__________________ Dynamix Studio rig: Amd athlon x2 4800 | MSI K8N neo4 | 4x 1Gb OCz Gold GX | Radeon x850xt | Radeon 9000 pci | 2x 15" LCD's |1x 19" LCD 1x projector | 4x raid0 barracuda 250's | Digidesign protools HD|3 [$soundcard>$house] | ultrasone proline750 headphones -peak recording:32 simultaneous 32bit 96 khz wav tracks |
| | |
| | #6 (permalink) |
| Just Started Join Date: 25 Jun 2006 Location: Naples Florida
Posts: 40
Reputation: 0 ![]() Rep Power: 0 | im talking about system to pixel latency
__________________ Dynamix Studio rig: Amd athlon x2 4800 | MSI K8N neo4 | 4x 1Gb OCz Gold GX | Radeon x850xt | Radeon 9000 pci | 2x 15" LCD's |1x 19" LCD 1x projector | 4x raid0 barracuda 250's | Digidesign protools HD|3 [$soundcard>$house] | ultrasone proline750 headphones -peak recording:32 simultaneous 32bit 96 khz wav tracks |
| | |
| | #8 (permalink) |
| Just Started Join Date: 25 Jun 2006 Location: Naples Florida
Posts: 40
Reputation: 0 ![]() Rep Power: 0 | right now an IBM p202, 21" sony trnintron. its got no system to pixel latency, but a bad "ghosting" effect as i said in the first post it takes like 20-30 frames for my cursor to fade out all the way, from white to black noticable in games and such about 2-5 frames D: makes a quickscope in CS harder to manage. if an LCD didnt ghost at all, im sure a system to pixel latency wouldnt be too much of a bother. and i could understand the idea of there being no perfect monitors out there D:
__________________ Dynamix Studio rig: Amd athlon x2 4800 | MSI K8N neo4 | 4x 1Gb OCz Gold GX | Radeon x850xt | Radeon 9000 pci | 2x 15" LCD's |1x 19" LCD 1x projector | 4x raid0 barracuda 250's | Digidesign protools HD|3 [$soundcard>$house] | ultrasone proline750 headphones -peak recording:32 simultaneous 32bit 96 khz wav tracks |
| | |
| | #9 (permalink) |
| Administrator Join Date: 6 Oct 2002 Location: Maranello
Posts: 27,884
Reputation: 4630 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Rep Power: 81 | I'm actually refering to the LCD monitor that you were comparing with. I've seen a lot of hardcore gamers complaining about the ghosting, but never the pixel latency that you were talking about. But judging from your 15", I'm pretty sure they are fairly old. I think technology has improved a lot since then. |
| | |
| | #10 (permalink) |
| Just Started Join Date: 25 Jun 2006 Location: Naples Florida
Posts: 40
Reputation: 0 ![]() Rep Power: 0 | quite possible that it was an older LCD. i eman supposedly LCD's are digitalo and hooking one up vga must mean some kind of analog to digital conversion? or vice versa depending. i want the perfect monitor though. no delay no ghosting large res, speedy updating, bright picture. the only problems with what i have now are heat, and ghosting, it gets really annoying, especially when its fades from bright ro dark, like when i played doom3, to an extent it looked cool, like motion blurring. but playing online, it just messed up my gaming.
__________________ Dynamix Studio rig: Amd athlon x2 4800 | MSI K8N neo4 | 4x 1Gb OCz Gold GX | Radeon x850xt | Radeon 9000 pci | 2x 15" LCD's |1x 19" LCD 1x projector | 4x raid0 barracuda 250's | Digidesign protools HD|3 [$soundcard>$house] | ultrasone proline750 headphones -peak recording:32 simultaneous 32bit 96 khz wav tracks |
| | |