![]() | ![]() |
| Register | |||||||
| Notebooks & Mobile Devices The place to discuss everything about notebooks, Palms, PocketPCs, cellphones, MP3 Players, or anything that's mobile! |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools |
| | #11 (permalink) |
| Hold me back! I can't stop posting!!! Join Date: 16 Dec 2002 Location: Floating Island Of Mandango
Posts: 8,732
Reputation: 3155 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Rep Power: 46 | if you do a search, you will notice that this forum has always advised everyone to go for bigger memory size instead of ultra high bandwidth. the usefulness of memory bandwidth has been way overhyped by memory vendors and certain media who don't investigate thoroughly - jsut a couple of sandra and everest, and call it a review (with editor's choice of course!). dual channel controller, yes it sounds exciting. after all, two is better than one, right? now, nahalem supports triple channels!!! but the truth is, even a single channel is good enough for this supposedly bandwidth hungry CPU. let me show you some figures. i chose power director 7 to convert 3 mins of a 1080 HD video that i took in house (because PD7 is heavily threaded) and the usual suspect, cinebench. 3.2GHz, turbo mode off. TRIPLE CHANNEL, 1066, 7-7-7-20, L3 cache at 2.6GHz. Power director 7: 13 min 03 second Cinebench (8 threads): 57 sec 3.2GHz, turbo mode off. Dual CHANNEL, 1066, 7-7-7-20, L3 cache at 2.6GHz. Power director 7: 13 min 12 second Cinebench (8 threads): 58 sec 3.2GHz, turbo mode off. Single CHANNEL, 1066, 7-7-7-20, L3 cache at 2.6GHz. Power director 7: 14min 36 sec Cinebench (8 threads): 58 sec 3.2GHz, turbo mode off. triple CHANNEL, 1333, 7-7-7-20, L3 cache at 2.6GHz. Power director 7: 13min 3 sec Cinebench (8 threads): 58 sec 3.2GHz, turbo mode off. triple CHANNEL, 1600, 8-8-8-20, L3 cache at 3.2GHz. Power director 7: 13min 05sec Cinebench (8 threads): 56 sec this is a new gen chip that connects directly to the memory, and it doesn't make any significant differences. Centrino platform still uses the older FSB interconnect, so really, just forget about the number of memory channel you should utilize, and throw in all the sticks you have. you want to have more memory available. not more memory channel. unless, of course, you are running virtual machines.
__________________ my motto: poison first, think later. Last edited by ZuePhok : 12th Nov 2008 at 04:58 PM. |
| | |
| SPONSOR |
| |