Core 2 Quad QX6700 performance review

http://enthusiast.hardocp.com/article.html?art=MTE4NCwxLCxoZW50aHVzaWFzdA==

 

alreadi seen dual quad-core kensfield in action...
not for gamers..
but that posts a threat to amd's 4x4...

edit: my mistake, i mean dual quad-core clovertown

 

wow, it was only a year ago that they launched dual core, and now we will be gettig quad in just a month :S

cant believe @the rate intel's media *****es is increasing. Preview!? heh..if u have the guts, do la something like what THG did (not that I like THG or anything)

damn these balls suckers

 

those too much money dun care if can utilise all cores..they wan many many cores

 

Suddenly many cores lol. The world seems to be going the way of Instruction windowless buggers with 0 derived Instruction Level Parallelism like the IBM Toshiba Cell and the Xbox Xenon, where the programmer and not the chip designer get's the short end of the stick lol. This just some assed up conspiracy by chip makers to make their lives easier and burden underfed and underpaid programmers, whom slave away creating individual process and instruction threads to maximize performance or they lose their jobs.........wait, i'm not a programmer.........WOHOO!!

Anyways, i think a quadcore is fine too. Just like people said before dual core came along "WTF are you gonna do with 2 cores? Watch Porn and Play MMOs at the same time?", the point is, if there's no use for it, we'll find one.

2 Cores of F@H and 2 on my games seems like a nice thing to look forward to. I'm sold LOL.

 

Quad-cores? They haven't actually make software that is fully designed for these yet.

 

what kidna software are u referring to?

 

Software for the quad-cores. Or maybe they have invented a couple of them for the sake of benchmarks only. Uh... like these calculation programs?

 

err.......
okay..

 

So that's what you've been up to

 

The only game currently that is optimised for the Quad-Core is the Alan Wake game. The graphics are truly stunning, and majestic!!

 

5 years down the road, intel will probably need to do another campaign and training courses for their resellers saying more core != faster performance

now they are saying speed is no longer an indication of performance, and they are just "partly" to be blamed for this "confusion"

sorry im not ur *****. more core != more performance.

 

htye are getting bad feedback from the resellers i guess.

they need a quick fix, and obviously "more cores = faster" is the most sensible solution for them. and if it works, I think the consumer will still pick the Pentium D, instead of C2D, over Pentium 4 cuz first, it's cheaper (we are malaysian mah..), and second, it has 2 cores TOO!