Tech ARP Forums

Go Back   Tech ARP Forums > Hardware Discussion > Processors, Motherboards & Memory
Register
FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read

Google Web www.techarp.com forums.techarp.com

Processors, Motherboards & Memory Come here to discuss everything about processors, motherboards and memory!

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 9th May 2008, 06:28 PM   #1 (permalink)
ARP Reviewer
 
generalRage1982hrv's Avatar
 
Join Date: 13 Apr 2008
Location: Vukovar, Croatia
Posts: 405
Reputation: 111
generalRage1982hrv will become famous soon enoughgeneralRage1982hrv will become famous soon enough
Rep Power: 3
Default AMD announces 6-core and 12-core Opteron processors

Quote:
Sunnyvale (CA) – AMD has updated its server processor roadmap with single-die 6-core and dual-die 12-core Opteron processors. The new processors will be manufactured in a 45 nm process that will be introduced with the Shanghai quad-core later this year.

When Intel rolls out its Nehalem processors later this year, AMD appears to be better prepared than in late 2006 when Core began its triumph and until today pretty much wiped out all of the gains AMD Opteron has made in previous years. On the server side, AMD will counter Intel with the "Shanghai" quad-core CPU, which will be based on the current Barcelona technology, but will be manufactured in 45 nm and bring performance and power consumption benefits.

According to vice president Randy Allen, Shanghai will deliver about 20% more speed than Barcelona. While the chip will remain compatible with the current Socket F (1207) platform, the L3 cache will triple to 6 MB, 3-lane HT3 support will be integrated and DDR memory support will be extended to 800 MHz devices. AMD claims that the idle power consumption of the new CPUs will be 20% below their 65 nm counterparts.

Production of the 45 nm Shanghai quad-core chip, which has been sampled to server vendors, is scheduled to begin late this year, while first products should be surfacing in Q1 2009. In the second half of 2009, AMD plans to release a single-die 6-core Socket F processor code-named "Istanbul". Offered for two- and four-socket systems, the chip will be clocked at lower clock speeds than the quad-cores.

A completely new platform (read: a departure from Socket F) is planned to be introduced in 2010. Called the “Maranello” platform, AMD will then transition to DDR3 memory and four HT3 lanes. The multi-socket processors will include the monolithic 6-core “Sao Paulo” with 6 MB of L3 cache, new hardware throttling and power management features, as well as the dual-die 12-core “Magny Cours” processor with 12 MB L3 cache. Both processors will be built in 45 nm. At least at this time AMD does not anticipate any Nvidia chipsets to support this platform and says that it will couple the CPU with its own RD890S and RD870S northbridges as well as the SB700S southbridge.

Eagle-eyed readers may wonder about those production dates. A late 2008 45 nm volume production of these processors matches the information we received from industry sources and would mean that AMD will put 45 nm into production just about one year behind Intel. Intel plans on introducing 32 nm processors in late 2009 and AMD now indicates that its Sao Paulo and Magny Cours processors will be manufactured in 45 nm in the first half of 2010, leading us to believe that 32 nm won’t arrive until the second half of the year in a best case scenario. This could mean that AMD keeps up with Intel, but won’t gain any ground on Intel in this discipline anytime soon.

Randy Allen responded to our inquiry by saying that this assessment would not be accurate as server processors do not reflect the entire product range of AMD. However, at least for 45 nm, we have credible sources indicating that 45 nm AMD CPUs won’t arrive before Q4 of this year. The 2010 processors are too far out to speculate whether Intel will deliver them at the end of 2009 and whether AMD will have any 32 nm chips available in Q1 2010. But clearly, at least for now, the 2006 promises AMD made to analysts aren’t likely to be kept.

Until Shanghai arrives, AMD will have to survive with its Barcelona quad-core and it is not surprising that the company touts the power-efficiency drum to compare itself favorably to competing Intel products. Allen claimed that AMDs 75 watt part Opteron 2356 saves about 20% of power when idle, 14% in high-load scenarios and 10% under full-load when compared to Intel’s (45 nm) 80 watt Xeon 5440. The executive also noted that the Opteron delivers on average 13% more performance than its Intel counterpart. READ HERE TG Daily
this is great news if you ask me
i hope we will see soon a athlon version of that LOL
question is this will they stay on AM2+ or they will upgrade it (talking about athlons)
opteron is on Socket F LOL
__________________
www.technewshw.com

Last edited by generalRage1982hrv : 9th May 2008 at 06:33 PM.
generalRage1982hrv is offline   Reply With Quote
SPONSOR
Old 9th May 2008, 06:48 PM   #2 (permalink)
Pickin' Da Gitfiddle
 
Mac Daddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: 19 Nov 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,052
Reputation: 802
Mac Daddy is a splendid one to beholdMac Daddy is a splendid one to beholdMac Daddy is a splendid one to beholdMac Daddy is a splendid one to beholdMac Daddy is a splendid one to beholdMac Daddy is a splendid one to beholdMac Daddy is a splendid one to behold
Rep Power: 13
Default

Good news indeed Bro lets hope it helps AMD catch back up in the CPU market
__________________
Mac Daddy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th May 2008, 06:53 PM   #3 (permalink)
Da Boss
 
Join Date: 10 Oct 2002
Location: In front of my ASUS F8V notebook!
Posts: 33,137
Reputation: 3730
Adrian Wong has a reputation beyond reputeAdrian Wong has a reputation beyond reputeAdrian Wong has a reputation beyond reputeAdrian Wong has a reputation beyond reputeAdrian Wong has a reputation beyond reputeAdrian Wong has a reputation beyond reputeAdrian Wong has a reputation beyond reputeAdrian Wong has a reputation beyond reputeAdrian Wong has a reputation beyond reputeAdrian Wong has a reputation beyond reputeAdrian Wong has a reputation beyond repute
Rep Power: 78
Default

It actually looks like they are slipping. They won't be able to deliver 45nm processors until NEXT year. That's going to be a real problem for them.
__________________
Dr. Adrian Wong
Tech ARP | Blog @ Tech ARP | The Free Trade Zone


DYKT : The only offshore account I have is at the sand bank?

We need PROGRAMMERS and TECHNICAL WRITERS! Contact us if you are a hot shot programmer or technical writer!

My items for sale : 50x SD Card | Memory Stick PRO | Cyclone Energy Saver | Seiko SS watch | Tiger/Carlsberg beer jugs | Travel Speakers | Motorola V600 | Nokia N90 SOLD! | New Lowepro Mini Trekker AW

Other items for sale @ the FTZ : Zalman CNPS9500 LED @ $20 | Zalman CNPS7700 Cu @ $20 | Zalman CNPS7000 Cu @ $20 | Swarovski bracelet watches | Dell 17" LCD | Hi-Fi speakers | English DIVX movies | HP LaserJet toners! | Office chairs
Adrian Wong is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th May 2008, 06:56 PM   #4 (permalink)
Pickin' Da Gitfiddle
 
Mac Daddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: 19 Nov 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,052
Reputation: 802
Mac Daddy is a splendid one to beholdMac Daddy is a splendid one to beholdMac Daddy is a splendid one to beholdMac Daddy is a splendid one to beholdMac Daddy is a splendid one to beholdMac Daddy is a splendid one to beholdMac Daddy is a splendid one to behold
Rep Power: 13
Default

Thats true I misread it I thought it was the AMD being released later this year hmmm .. well lets see what happens ...
__________________
Mac Daddy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th May 2008, 07:20 PM   #5 (permalink)
ARP Reviewer
 
generalRage1982hrv's Avatar
 
Join Date: 13 Apr 2008
Location: Vukovar, Croatia
Posts: 405
Reputation: 111
generalRage1982hrv will become famous soon enoughgeneralRage1982hrv will become famous soon enough
Rep Power: 3
Default

no wonder why they cant make 45nm in time
because they cuted their working power for 30% (talking about workers)
__________________
www.technewshw.com
generalRage1982hrv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th May 2008, 07:58 PM   #6 (permalink)
h@x!
 
Max_87's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11 Aug 2003
Location: the land of bandwidth cap
Posts: 11,446
Reputation: 2090
Max_87 has a reputation beyond reputeMax_87 has a reputation beyond reputeMax_87 has a reputation beyond reputeMax_87 has a reputation beyond reputeMax_87 has a reputation beyond reputeMax_87 has a reputation beyond reputeMax_87 has a reputation beyond reputeMax_87 has a reputation beyond reputeMax_87 has a reputation beyond reputeMax_87 has a reputation beyond reputeMax_87 has a reputation beyond repute
Rep Power: 38
Default

With the way things are going, I seriously doubt they can deliver it in 2009. Maybe a paperlaunch at best or it will never be launched
__________________
Max_87
Tech ARP
http://www.techarp.com

Dell Studio 15 / P7350 / 3GB DDR2 / Radeon HD 3450 / 250GB 7200RPM / 15" @ 1920x1200

E8600 @ 4.4GHz 1.36v / Asus P5E3 Deluxe / 2x2GB DDR3 / Radeon X1800 / Barracuda 7200.9 120GB / 7200.10 320GB x2 / Caviar SE16 WD5000AAKS / WD6400AAKS x2 / Dell 2007FP x2 / Silverstone ST56F
Max_87 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10th May 2008, 03:32 AM   #7 (permalink)
I'm a regular
 
Join Date: 7 May 2006
Posts: 367
Reputation: -118
CALLOFDUTY05 CALLOFDUTY05
Rep Power: 0
Default

I've heard this before but seriously what will we do with those 6/12 core processors when most games or applications still can't be benefited even with a Quad core.Owning cool new products is nice but why paying so high when they don't have any practical use ? Also AMD has lost their place.I don't think, they will ever be comparable again with Intel's offerings of the same time.Thanks for the news though.
CALLOFDUTY05 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th May 2008, 02:20 AM   #8 (permalink)
Just Started
 
Midicow's Avatar
 
Join Date: 4 May 2008
Posts: 59
Reputation: 0
Midicow is an unknown quantity at this point
Rep Power: 0
Default

I'm really hoping that AMD finds a way to take advantage of memristors in their cpus... HP scientists remarked in their recent rediscovery of them, that only two are needed to do the functions of a transistor.

Also, memristors get more and more efficient the smaller they get, which is quite the opposite of transistors.
Midicow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th May 2008, 02:25 AM   #9 (permalink)
Hold me back! I can't stop posting!!!
 
Join Date: 16 Dec 2002
Location: Floating Island Of Mandango
Posts: 8,810
Reputation: 3294
ZuePhok has a reputation beyond reputeZuePhok has a reputation beyond reputeZuePhok has a reputation beyond reputeZuePhok has a reputation beyond reputeZuePhok has a reputation beyond reputeZuePhok has a reputation beyond reputeZuePhok has a reputation beyond reputeZuePhok has a reputation beyond reputeZuePhok has a reputation beyond reputeZuePhok has a reputation beyond reputeZuePhok has a reputation beyond repute
Rep Power: 48
Default

2010!? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA based on AMD's track record, mark it as 2011!

is this a news or what!? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
__________________
my motto: poison first, think later.
ZuePhok is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd Jun 2008, 04:50 AM   #10 (permalink)
Just Started
 
Join Date: 22 Jun 2007
Posts: 37
Reputation: 0
vgwong is an unknown quantity at this point
Rep Power: 0
Default

Just how many feet do they have to shoot themselves with?
vgwong is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Howto Guide: Overclocking C2D/C2Q Processors (v1.6) graysky Overclocking, Cooling & Modding 32 7th Jul 2008 08:02 AM
Intel announces P965 Core 2 Duo chipset, sub-1 watt processor! Dashken News 2 26th Jun 2006 09:35 AM


All times are GMT +8. The time now is 09:15 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.1.0
Copyright © 1998-2009 Tech ARP. All rights reserved.