Tech ARP Forums

Go Back   Tech ARP Forums > Site Updates & Promotions > Reviews & Articles
Register
FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read

Google Web www.techarp.com forums.techarp.com

Reviews & Articles There will be a post for every Tech ARP article. Come in here to discuss about your favourite article!

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 30th Jan 2005, 09:50 PM   #1 (permalink)
Administrator!
 
Dashken's Avatar
 
Join Date: 21 Apr 2003
Location: Penang
Posts: 30,332
Reputation: 2417
Dashken has a reputation beyond reputeDashken has a reputation beyond reputeDashken has a reputation beyond reputeDashken has a reputation beyond reputeDashken has a reputation beyond reputeDashken has a reputation beyond reputeDashken has a reputation beyond reputeDashken has a reputation beyond reputeDashken has a reputation beyond reputeDashken has a reputation beyond reputeDashken has a reputation beyond repute
Rep Power: 62
Default Intel Centrino Overclocking Guide Posted!

Due to their proprietary nature, notebooks have so far eluded attempts at overclocking. Except for isolated cases, notebooks have so far been safe from the overclocking craze. Until today, that is.

Today, we will show you how to overclock Intel Centrino motherboards! We will show you how to do it, as well as explore the risks and the rewards associated with such an attempt.


Link : Intel Centrino Overclocking Guide!
__________________
| Intel C2Q Q9450 | MSI P45 Neo3-FR | 2 x 2GB OCZ / 2 x 1GB G.SKILL DDR2 800 | 1 x Seagate 250GB HDD | 2 x Seagate 750GB HDD | 3 x Seagate 1TB HDD | NVIDIA GeForce 9500GT | Cooler Master CM690 chassis | Cooler Master eXtreme Power Plus 550W PSU | Dell E248WFP 24" Widescreen | Windows 7 Ultimate x64 |


Blog : Dashken's I-Blog
Gallery : Dashken's I-Paintings
Dashken is offline   Reply With Quote
SPONSOR
Old 31st Jan 2005, 01:29 AM   #2 (permalink)
Newbie
 
aye29's Avatar
 
Join Date: 31 Jan 2005
Posts: 4
Reputation: 0
aye29 is an unknown quantity at this point
Rep Power: 0
Default

In the section about PCI Speeds, you said that "we only tested up to the FSB speed of 125MHz. At that FSB speed, the PCI bus would be running at 41.6MHz." Why does the screenshot of ClockGen in the previous section show a PCI speed of only 20.24MHz when the FSB speed is 121MHz?
aye29 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31st Jan 2005, 01:32 AM   #3 (permalink)
Da Boss
 
Join Date: 10 Oct 2002
Location: In front of my ASUS F8V notebook!
Posts: 33,850
Reputation: 3948
Adrian Wong has a reputation beyond reputeAdrian Wong has a reputation beyond reputeAdrian Wong has a reputation beyond reputeAdrian Wong has a reputation beyond reputeAdrian Wong has a reputation beyond reputeAdrian Wong has a reputation beyond reputeAdrian Wong has a reputation beyond reputeAdrian Wong has a reputation beyond reputeAdrian Wong has a reputation beyond reputeAdrian Wong has a reputation beyond reputeAdrian Wong has a reputation beyond repute
Rep Power: 80
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by aye29
In the section about PCI Speeds, you said that "we only tested up to the FSB speed of 125MHz. At that FSB speed, the PCI bus would be running at 41.6MHz." Why does the screenshot of ClockGen in the previous section show a PCI speed of only 20.24MHz when the FSB speed is 121MHz?
That's because that screenshot was for the processor speed of 1.7GHz with the FSB speed of 121MHz and PCI clock speed of 40.48MHz.

After that, we went a bit further.. to 1.75GHz but no further. We did not take a screenshot for 1.75GHz.
Adrian Wong is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31st Jan 2005, 01:39 AM   #4 (permalink)
Newbie
 
aye29's Avatar
 
Join Date: 31 Jan 2005
Posts: 4
Reputation: 0
aye29 is an unknown quantity at this point
Rep Power: 0
Default

I understand that you didn't take a screenshot of the processor at 1.75GHz. I don't understand why ClockGen reported the PCI speed to be only 20.24Mhz and not 40.48MHz as it should be when running at 1.70GHz.
aye29 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31st Jan 2005, 01:56 AM   #5 (permalink)
Da Boss
 
Join Date: 10 Oct 2002
Location: In front of my ASUS F8V notebook!
Posts: 33,850
Reputation: 3948
Adrian Wong has a reputation beyond reputeAdrian Wong has a reputation beyond reputeAdrian Wong has a reputation beyond reputeAdrian Wong has a reputation beyond reputeAdrian Wong has a reputation beyond reputeAdrian Wong has a reputation beyond reputeAdrian Wong has a reputation beyond reputeAdrian Wong has a reputation beyond reputeAdrian Wong has a reputation beyond reputeAdrian Wong has a reputation beyond reputeAdrian Wong has a reputation beyond repute
Rep Power: 80
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by aye29
I understand that you didn't take a screenshot of the processor at 1.75GHz. I don't understand why ClockGen reported the PCI speed to be only 20.24Mhz and not 40.48MHz as it should be when running at 1.70GHz.
We are not sure either.

Possibly the Toshiba M30 motherboard is using a minor variation of the ICS clock generator. This may have allowed proper adjustment of the FSB but caused ClockGen to report the PCI and AGP clocks at half the actual clock speeds.
Adrian Wong is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31st Jan 2005, 07:44 AM   #6 (permalink)
Administrator
 
Chai's Avatar
 
Join Date: 6 Oct 2002
Location: Maranello
Posts: 28,333
Reputation: 4864
Chai has a reputation beyond reputeChai has a reputation beyond reputeChai has a reputation beyond reputeChai has a reputation beyond reputeChai has a reputation beyond reputeChai has a reputation beyond reputeChai has a reputation beyond reputeChai has a reputation beyond reputeChai has a reputation beyond reputeChai has a reputation beyond reputeChai has a reputation beyond repute
Rep Power: 84
Default

These clockgens may not be accurate when reporting the PCI and AGP speed, because they normally cannot detect the PCI speed thru software, this is especially true for boards without PCI lock.
__________________
Chai (Contributor & Forum Admin)
http://www.techarp.com/
Chai is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31st Jan 2005, 01:03 PM   #7 (permalink)
Da Boss
 
Join Date: 10 Oct 2002
Location: In front of my ASUS F8V notebook!
Posts: 33,850
Reputation: 3948
Adrian Wong has a reputation beyond reputeAdrian Wong has a reputation beyond reputeAdrian Wong has a reputation beyond reputeAdrian Wong has a reputation beyond reputeAdrian Wong has a reputation beyond reputeAdrian Wong has a reputation beyond reputeAdrian Wong has a reputation beyond reputeAdrian Wong has a reputation beyond reputeAdrian Wong has a reputation beyond reputeAdrian Wong has a reputation beyond reputeAdrian Wong has a reputation beyond repute
Rep Power: 80
Default

Yeah, that's why we still had to confirm that there was no PCI lock with the Centrino motherboard by running tests with HDTach.
Adrian Wong is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31st Jan 2005, 02:56 PM   #8 (permalink)
Newbie
 
Join Date: 31 Jan 2005
Posts: 2
Reputation: 0
zamo_x is an unknown quantity at this point
Rep Power: 0
Default

i have the same model of notebook (satellite m30). i have tried to overclock.. all the things work excellent except the sound.. which doesn't want. it works only at default fsb.
what about the cooling? have you seen any difference, heat increase?

Last edited by zamo_x : 31st Jan 2005 at 03:38 PM.
zamo_x is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31st Jan 2005, 05:53 PM   #9 (permalink)
ARP Webmaster
 
peaz's Avatar
 
Join Date: 13 Oct 2002
Location: http://atpeaz.com/
Posts: 8,640
Reputation: 1748
peaz has a brilliant futurepeaz has a brilliant futurepeaz has a brilliant futurepeaz has a brilliant futurepeaz has a brilliant futurepeaz has a brilliant futurepeaz has a brilliant futurepeaz has a brilliant futurepeaz has a brilliant futurepeaz has a brilliant futurepeaz has a brilliant future
Rep Power: 33
Default

Looks like the sound chip does not like the increased PCI Bus, i guess there's no choice but to bump it back down to the default speed
__________________
Ken Ng
Tech ARP
Follow me at Twitter
Blogs @ http://www.atpeaz.com/
peaz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31st Jan 2005, 06:04 PM   #10 (permalink)
Da Boss
 
Join Date: 10 Oct 2002
Location: In front of my ASUS F8V notebook!
Posts: 33,850
Reputation: 3948
Adrian Wong has a reputation beyond reputeAdrian Wong has a reputation beyond reputeAdrian Wong has a reputation beyond reputeAdrian Wong has a reputation beyond reputeAdrian Wong has a reputation beyond reputeAdrian Wong has a reputation beyond reputeAdrian Wong has a reputation beyond reputeAdrian Wong has a reputation beyond reputeAdrian Wong has a reputation beyond reputeAdrian Wong has a reputation beyond reputeAdrian Wong has a reputation beyond repute
Rep Power: 80
Default

Huh, you sure the sound chip won't work, even with a slight overclock?

There will be an increase in thermal output, no doubt. After all, everything is now running faster.

However, the Pentium M processor and the i855PM chipset don't have a very high thermal output in the first place so you should not need to worry too much about overheating.

In fact, our M30 was completely stable even at 1.75GHz. We could have gone higher, I suspect, if only the PCI bus was locked.
Adrian Wong is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +8. The time now is 08:50 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.1.0
Copyright © 1998-2009 Tech ARP. All rights reserved.