Desktop CPU Comparison Guide!

[ChampionLLY]

oh... u missed out Q6600 (2.4Ghz w/ locked multi, TDP 105W):

http://www.legitreviews.com/news/2763/
http://www.techspot.com/review/36-in...e2-quad-q6600/
http://www.firingsquad.com/hardware/...q6600_preview/
http://www.hardware.info/productdb/b..._2_Quad_Q6600/
http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=36494

[werty316]

Originally Posted by ChampionLLY

and why is the specs for E6300 & E6320 exactly the same?
isnt the E6320 suppose to have a full 4MB L2?
(same for E6400 & E6420)

Yep that is wrong as the E6320 & E6420 are suppose to have 4MB of L2 cache.

[Max_87]

Originally Posted by ChampionLLY

i'm surprised u didnt include wad i posted in #42

and why is the specs for E6300 & E6320 exactly the same?
isnt the E6320 suppose to have a full 4MB L2?
(same for E6400 & E6420)

Uhhh I forgot to add nvm, going to update it again and correct the mistakes.

They ARE exactly the same except the 4MB L2 part

[Max_87]

Originally Posted by ChampionLLY

oh... u missed out Q6600 (2.4Ghz w/ locked multi, TDP 105W):

http://www.legitreviews.com/news/2763/
http://www.techspot.com/review/36-in...e2-quad-q6600/
http://www.firingsquad.com/hardware/...q6600_preview/
http://www.hardware.info/productdb/b..._2_Quad_Q6600/
http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=36494

eh I thought this was added already thanks for reminding us. Update coming shortly.

[Anonymous Freak]

You have the 'instruction sets supported' columns, and in them, you list "CISC" and "RISC" as instruction sets.

That's like saying you were robbed by a guy wearing 'pastel' or 'bright'. They are descriptions of the instruction set, not instruction sets themselves. (IA32/x86, IA64 (Itanium,) and AMD64/x86-64/x64/EM64T are instruction set names.)

Not to mention you're wrong on many of them. All current x86 processors present themselves to the OS as CISC processors. The fact that deep down, they operate more like RISC processors has no actual effect on anything. You might as well also list superscalar and out-of-order execution if you're going to list CISC and RISC. (And everything Pentium Pro and up, including all Pentium II and Celeron processors, are 'RISC at heart'.)

Also, only the graphical logo for the Pentium 3 does it look like "Pentium !!!". Everywhere else, it is "Pentium III" (See here for a sample.) And *ALL* Pentium III's, even the Katmai's, include SSE. That is what made it different than the Pentium II.

[ChampionLLY]

Originally Posted by werty316

Yep that is wrong as the E6320 & E6420 are suppose to have 4MB of L2 cache.

yea, its highly unlikely that intel will introduce an exact same specs processor utilizing the same core as a diff model

[ChampionLLY]

Originally Posted by Max_87

eh I thought this was added already thanks for reminding us. Update coming shortly.

okok... to do list :

1) 4MB L2 for e632/e642
2) FX-70 series
3) Q66

[ChampionLLY]

btw, where did u find the news on the Q4/06 release of X6900?

i googled n all i find is "preview" & so-call "reviews" while they all use X6800 overclocked

not seen a cpu-z screenshot nor photo of the chip

[Max_87]

Originally Posted by ChampionLLY

btw, where did u find the news on the Q4/06 release of X6900?

i googled n all i find is "preview" & so-call "reviews" while they all use X6800 overclocked

not seen a cpu-z screenshot nor photo of the chip

I don't remember

Anyway, updating the stuffs now

[ChampionLLY]

Originally Posted by Max_87

I don't remember

Anyway, updating the stuffs now

alrite den... rep point for ur effort =D =D