Desktop CPU Comparison Guide! - Page 7

Max_87 · 13th Feb 2007, 12:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Anonymous Freak

You have the 'instruction sets supported' columns, and in them, you list "CISC" and "RISC" as instruction sets.

That's like saying you were robbed by a guy wearing 'pastel' or 'bright'. They are descriptions of the instruction set, not instruction sets themselves. (IA32/x86, IA64 (Itanium,) and AMD64/x86-64/x64/EM64T are instruction set names.)

I don't get what you are saying

If you are wondering why some of the supported instruction set are gone, PLEASE go through the whole page to find this:

Quote:

* Note that due to lack of space, we have to truncate the Instruction Set list above. Instead, we will only list the latest addition to the instruction set. Here's the full list of instruction sets :

Quote:

Originally Posted by Anonymous Freak

Not to mention you're wrong on many of them. All current x86 processors present themselves to the OS as CISC processors. The fact that deep down, they operate more like RISC processors has no actual effect on anything. You might as well also list superscalar and out-of-order execution if you're going to list CISC and RISC. (And everything Pentium Pro and up, including all Pentium II and Celeron processors, are 'RISC at heart'.)

Also, only the graphical logo for the Pentium 3 does it look like "Pentium !!!". Everywhere else, it is "Pentium III" (See here for a sample.) And *ALL* Pentium III's, even the Katmai's, include SSE. That is what made it different than the Pentium II.

Please at least show me links to any sources that supports your info. All you do is saying "Oh this is wrong. Oh that is wrong. Oh many are wrong" and you expect me to just correct everything according to what you said?

As for the Pentium !!!/III thing, I'm working on it now.

Max_87 · 13th Feb 2007, 12:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChampionLLY

alrite den... rep point for ur effort =D =D

Thanks for the reminder/providing the info too

+rep

There are just too many of them until I can't keep track of where I found each of them

Just finished updating it. Now have to wait for it to be posted.

ChampionLLY · 13th Feb 2007, 01:00 AM

oh thx... seems like i'm one of the active few who keeps track of all these stuffs in the comparison guides..

actually i think P3= PIII= P!!!

anyway, IA32 is not an "instruction set" but rather an "instruction set architecture":
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IA-32

Max_87 · 15th Feb 2007, 02:58 AM

Well they are they same, but the official name used by Intel is III, so I changed them all to III...

brajko2 · 15th Feb 2007, 07:26 PM

I was just wondering from where did you get info's about all of those Intel processors?
http://processorfinder.intel.com or http://www.cpu-world.com ?
Since I saw some info that maybe isn't all that correct. But then again, who does garantee that cpu-world has the correct info..

ChampionLLY · 15th Feb 2007, 08:46 PM

ok, that one not realli important i guess..

well, u've gotta google n search for more info..
intel or amd official site doesnt tell u everything, or else they wouldnt be making this guide.. make sense?

The_YongGrand · 16th Feb 2007, 10:35 PM

Hmm... where are the newer Celeron D with 512K cache? The 65nm versions are only two there...

Dashken · 12th Aug 2007, 12:06 AM

There are so many CPU models that it has become quite impossible to keep up with the different models or even remember their specifications.

Therefore, we decided to compile this guide to provide an easy reference for those who are interested in comparing the specifications of the various desktop CPUs in the market, as well as those already obsolescent or obsolete.

Currently covering over 590 desktop CPUs, this comprehensive comparison will allow you to easily compare up to 18 different specifications for each and every CPU.

Here are the updates:-

Quote:

- Added the Intel Pentium Dual-Core E2140 & E2160 processors.
- Added the Intel Core 2 Duo E6550 processor.
- Added the Intel Core 2 Extreme QX6800 & QX6850 processors.
- Corrected numerous mistakes for the Intel Core 2 series.
- Removed Core 2 Solo & Core 2 Duo E6650 processors.
- Total CPUs : 593

Link : Desktop CPU Comparison Guide Rev. 3.4

myrandex · 13th Aug 2007, 10:02 PM

I am pretty sure that the Clawhammer specs are wrong as I am 99% sure that they included NXBit as well.

Max_87 · 14th Aug 2007, 06:51 PM

Only the CG stepping supports NX-bit.

15th Feb 2007, 02:58 AM	#64 (permalink)
Max_87 h@x! Join Date: 11 Aug 2003 Location: the land of bandwidth cap Posts: 11,430 Reputation: 2090 Rep Power: 38	Well they are they same, but the official name used by Intel is III, so I changed them all to III... __________________ Max_87 Tech ARP http://www.techarp.com Dell Studio 15 / P7350 / 3GB DDR2 / Radeon HD 3450 / 250GB 7200RPM / 15" @ 1920x1200 E8600 @ 4.4GHz 1.36v / Asus P5E3 Deluxe / 2x2GB DDR3 / Radeon X1800 / Barracuda 7200.9 120GB / 7200.10 320GB x2 / Caviar SE16 WD5000AAKS / WD6400AAKS x2 / Dell 2007FP x2 / Silverstone ST56F

16th Feb 2007, 10:35 PM	#67 (permalink)
The_YongGrand Hyperactive Join Date: 12 Feb 2005 Location: Somewhere in 甲洞... Posts: 2,744 Reputation: 1144 Rep Power: 18	Hmm... where are the newer Celeron D with 512K cache? The 65nm versions are only two there... __________________ Intel Core 2 Duo E7200, 2GB DDR2-667 RAM, Gigabyte 945GCMX-S2, Sapphire ATi Radeon HD4850 512MB DDR3 Intel Pentium Dual Core E2140, 2GB DDR2-667 RAM, Asus P5B-E Plus, nVidia Geforce 7950GT 512MB DDR3

14th Aug 2007, 06:51 PM	#70 (permalink)
Max_87 h@x! Join Date: 11 Aug 2003 Location: the land of bandwidth cap Posts: 11,430 Reputation: 2090 Rep Power: 38	Only the CG stepping supports NX-bit. __________________ Max_87 Tech ARP http://www.techarp.com Dell Studio 15 / P7350 / 3GB DDR2 / Radeon HD 3450 / 250GB 7200RPM / 15" @ 1920x1200 E8600 @ 4.4GHz 1.36v / Asus P5E3 Deluxe / 2x2GB DDR3 / Radeon X1800 / Barracuda 7200.9 120GB / 7200.10 320GB x2 / Caviar SE16 WD5000AAKS / WD6400AAKS x2 / Dell 2007FP x2 / Silverstone ST56F

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Desktop Graphics Card Comparison Guide	peaz	Reviews & Articles	435	17th Nov 2009 12:12 AM
The Mobile GPU Comparison Guide	peaz	Reviews & Articles	178	16th Oct 2009 10:57 AM
The Workstation GPU Comparison Guide!	Adrian Wong	Reviews & Articles	28	12th Oct 2009 06:07 PM
BIOS Optimization Guide Revision 10.8	Adrian Wong	BIOS Optimization Guide (BOG)	156	2nd Aug 2009 08:44 PM
Windows Desktop Heap Tweak Guide Posted!	Dashken	Reviews & Articles	32	24th Jun 2007 10:47 PM

13th Feb 2007, 01:00 AM	#63 (permalink)
ChampionLLY News Writer Join Date: 23 Apr 2006 Posts: 1,265 Reputation: 757 Rep Power: 12	oh thx... seems like i'm one of the active few who keeps track of all these stuffs in the comparison guides.. actually i think P3= PIII= P!!! anyway, IA32 is not an "instruction set" but rather an "instruction set architecture": http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IA-32

15th Feb 2007, 07:26 PM	#65 (permalink)
brajko2 Just Started Join Date: 24 Feb 2006 Posts: 32 Reputation: 0 Rep Power: 0	I was just wondering from where did you get info's about all of those Intel processors? http://processorfinder.intel.com or http://www.cpu-world.com ? Since I saw some info that maybe isn't all that correct. But then again, who does garantee that cpu-world has the correct info..

15th Feb 2007, 08:46 PM	#66 (permalink)
ChampionLLY News Writer Join Date: 23 Apr 2006 Posts: 1,265 Reputation: 757 Rep Power: 12	ok, that one not realli important i guess.. well, u've gotta google n search for more info.. intel or amd official site doesnt tell u everything, or else they wouldnt be making this guide.. make sense?

13th Aug 2007, 10:02 PM	#69 (permalink)
myrandex Newbie Join Date: 4 Oct 2006 Posts: 2 Reputation: 0 Rep Power: 0	I am pretty sure that the Clawhammer specs are wrong as I am 99% sure that they included NXBit as well.