Tech ARP Forums

Go Back   Tech ARP Forums > Site Updates & Promotions > Reviews & Articles
Register
FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read

Google Web www.techarp.com forums.techarp.com

Reviews & Articles There will be a post for every Tech ARP article. Come in here to discuss about your favourite article!

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 2nd Aug 2007, 01:25 PM   #21 (permalink)
Newbie
 
charge-n-go's Avatar
 
Join Date: 16 May 2007
Location: Penang
Posts: 24
Reputation: 0
charge-n-go is an unknown quantity at this point
Rep Power: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chai View Post
Actually, I agree with most of your info except this.

"EIST -
manages processor P-state in the C0 state only."

Are you sure it's C0 state, not C1 state? Because everything you said is right, except that, from my experience anyway. I mean, I see no purpose in having EIST when it's in C0 state. While would you want to throttle the CPU when there's CPU usage?
That is the sole purpose of P-state (Performance State). It manages the processor to give the best performance per watt. A simple question for you: do you want to use Microsoft Word at 65W or 25W if the performance difference is negligible? This is how P-state manage the power according to the CPU load. However, since the transition from one P-state to another is within nano seconds, and the fastest detection tools we have can only report at probably 250 micro second range. So you won't see the changes until it is stabilized at the lowest / highest CPU clock speed for some time.

And yes, i am very sure EIST = P-state power management. It is called Geyserville technology in Intel.

In C1, the processor executes nothing. The execution unit is completed stalled as mentioned in guide. So there is no point to through every level of P-state. It will go straight into the lowest P-state which gives u 6x ratio. The purpose of using lowest P-state in C1, C2 and etc. was already mentioned in the guide too.

If you have any doubts. please read the ACPI specification. It mentioned clearly that P-state power management resides in C0 state.
__________________
< My Low power PC >
AMD Opteron 144 | 512MB x 2 XMS3200 | DFI LP UT nF4 Ultra-D | Galaxy 7300GT 128MB DDR3 | 200GB Seagate Baracuda SATA II | Coolermaster Centurion 5 | Enermax Liberty 400W | Scythe Ninja Fanless

Estimated max power = 120W

Last edited by charge-n-go : 2nd Aug 2007 at 01:35 PM.
charge-n-go is offline   Reply With Quote
SPONSOR
Old 2nd Aug 2007, 02:15 PM   #22 (permalink)
Administrator
 
Chai's Avatar
 
Join Date: 6 Oct 2002
Location: Maranello
Posts: 28,113
Reputation: 4649
Chai has a reputation beyond reputeChai has a reputation beyond reputeChai has a reputation beyond reputeChai has a reputation beyond reputeChai has a reputation beyond reputeChai has a reputation beyond reputeChai has a reputation beyond reputeChai has a reputation beyond reputeChai has a reputation beyond reputeChai has a reputation beyond reputeChai has a reputation beyond repute
Rep Power: 82
Default

I also noticed a significant power usage drop at idle compare to EIST disabled.

I guess I can forget what ever I'm going to do now. Haha. Thanks for your info.
__________________
Chai (Contributor & Forum Admin)
http://www.techarp.com/
Chai is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd Aug 2007, 03:41 PM   #23 (permalink)
Newbie
 
charge-n-go's Avatar
 
Join Date: 16 May 2007
Location: Penang
Posts: 24
Reputation: 0
charge-n-go is an unknown quantity at this point
Rep Power: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chai View Post
I also noticed a significant power usage drop at idle compare to EIST disabled.

I guess I can forget what ever I'm going to do now. Haha. Thanks for your info.
Welcome dude

Yea, because C1 is sleep state, the whole core is put down into HALT mode. C0 is active, so even the processor runs at lowest clock speed, there are still millions of transistor working. C1 actually runs at highest clock speed, but C1E brings it down to lowest clock speed. This is more logical lo.

anyway, if u still have doubts, can post here or IM me directly @ YM ! cyeeyong
__________________
< My Low power PC >
AMD Opteron 144 | 512MB x 2 XMS3200 | DFI LP UT nF4 Ultra-D | Galaxy 7300GT 128MB DDR3 | 200GB Seagate Baracuda SATA II | Coolermaster Centurion 5 | Enermax Liberty 400W | Scythe Ninja Fanless

Estimated max power = 120W
charge-n-go is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd Aug 2007, 03:55 PM   #24 (permalink)
Administrator
 
Chai's Avatar
 
Join Date: 6 Oct 2002
Location: Maranello
Posts: 28,113
Reputation: 4649
Chai has a reputation beyond reputeChai has a reputation beyond reputeChai has a reputation beyond reputeChai has a reputation beyond reputeChai has a reputation beyond reputeChai has a reputation beyond reputeChai has a reputation beyond reputeChai has a reputation beyond reputeChai has a reputation beyond reputeChai has a reputation beyond reputeChai has a reputation beyond repute
Rep Power: 82
Default

But the thing is C1E wasn't enabled. And when it's enabled, the voltage dropped to 1.1V. I'm sure without EIST, the C1 state will always be active.
__________________
Chai (Contributor & Forum Admin)
http://www.techarp.com/
Chai is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd Aug 2007, 03:46 PM   #25 (permalink)
Newbie
 
charge-n-go's Avatar
 
Join Date: 16 May 2007
Location: Penang
Posts: 24
Reputation: 0
charge-n-go is an unknown quantity at this point
Rep Power: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chai View Post
But the thing is C1E wasn't enabled. And when it's enabled, the voltage dropped to 1.1V. I'm sure without EIST, the C1 state will always be active.
Yes you are right. C1 is an automated mechanism. The 'E' behind is just a new feature to enable the clock and voltage throttling before C1 kicks in.
__________________
< My Low power PC >
AMD Opteron 144 | 512MB x 2 XMS3200 | DFI LP UT nF4 Ultra-D | Galaxy 7300GT 128MB DDR3 | 200GB Seagate Baracuda SATA II | Coolermaster Centurion 5 | Enermax Liberty 400W | Scythe Ninja Fanless

Estimated max power = 120W
charge-n-go is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th Aug 2007, 08:20 PM   #26 (permalink)
Getting there
 
Join Date: 18 Aug 2007
Posts: 183
Reputation: 249
graysky has a spectacular aura aboutgraysky has a spectacular aura aboutgraysky has a spectacular aura about
Rep Power: 5
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by charge-n-go View Post
Yes you are right. C1 is an automated mechanism. The 'E' behind is just a new feature to enable the clock and voltage throttling before C1 kicks in.
Is there an application that can display the current C or P state of the chip? I have noticed that coretemp ALWAYS show C0 state for my chip even when speedstep kicks in...
graysky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st Aug 2007, 04:16 PM   #27 (permalink)
Newbie
 
Join Date: 20 Aug 2007
Posts: 16
Reputation: 0
firefly is an unknown quantity at this point
Rep Power: 0
Default Request for advice ... :p

Quote:
Originally Posted by The_YongGrand View Post
Hey charge-and-go,

I happened to have the new Celeron 420 - the heatsink is really small, and it's just as cool as cucumber. The heat output - is absolutely minimal!! I touched the heatsink and it's just a little warm.

I don't have any measuring devices for wattage levels of CPU, but I'm pretty sure that it's really 35W...

Hi YongGrand and charge-and-go,

Been reading this forum and the 2 of you really sounded like a "sifu" to me, so .. was wondering .. whether I can get some advice from you guys ...

Was thinking to get a Celeron 420 too .. coz am going to put it in my room and was thinking of on it 24x7 .. for BT downloading ...

So, I was wondering .. will I get any problem if I were to on the PC 24x7? Will it ever get over-heated? Do I need to get any lightning arrester to protect my PC and modem? If so, can recommend any good one?

Also, I wish to run Vista Home Premium. Is there any additional hardware requirement to run Windows Aero?

Lastly, is this Celeron 420 fast enough for day to day use? What would be the ideal RAM for it? Care to advise?

Thanking you guys in advance ... and keep up the good work by sharing more knowledge and information ...
firefly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st Aug 2007, 07:28 PM   #28 (permalink)
Hyperactive
 
The_YongGrand's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12 Feb 2005
Location: Somewhere in 甲洞...
Posts: 2,871
Reputation: 1187
The_YongGrand has much to be proud ofThe_YongGrand has much to be proud ofThe_YongGrand has much to be proud ofThe_YongGrand has much to be proud ofThe_YongGrand has much to be proud ofThe_YongGrand has much to be proud ofThe_YongGrand has much to be proud ofThe_YongGrand has much to be proud ofThe_YongGrand has much to be proud of
Rep Power: 19
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by firefly View Post
Hi YongGrand and charge-and-go,

Been reading this forum and the 2 of you really sounded like a "sifu" to me, so .. was wondering .. whether I can get some advice from you guys ...

Was thinking to get a Celeron 420 too .. coz am going to put it in my room and was thinking of on it 24x7 .. for BT downloading ...

So, I was wondering .. will I get any problem if I were to on the PC 24x7? Will it ever get over-heated? Do I need to get any lightning arrester to protect my PC and modem? If so, can recommend any good one?

Also, I wish to run Vista Home Premium. Is there any additional hardware requirement to run Windows Aero?

Lastly, is this Celeron 420 fast enough for day to day use? What would be the ideal RAM for it? Care to advise?

Thanking you guys in advance ... and keep up the good work by sharing more knowledge and information ...
Hello and welcome!

Well the Celeron 420 (note the absence of D - it's for the older Cedar Mill and Prescott cores only) is quite a good buy if it's much cheaper! Yes the Celeron 420 is a very ideal one for HTPC and BT rig since it involves only a mere 35Ws. If you don't believe it - the heatsink of Celeron 4xx series are 1/2 of the size of the original stock 775 heatsink. But the thing is, the price of AMD X2 3600+ (not sure whether it is still sold!) looks tempting enough for you to buy that one instead of the Celeron 420. And the Athlons are also equipped with Cool and Quiet, so the throttling of speed will be even less than 35W for the Athlons. The Single-core Athlons are equipped with the same feature too, and it'll not be a worry for you since the performance of both 1-core Athlons64 and Celeron 4xx are almost the same.

The performance of Celeron 420 is comparable to Pentium 4 531 - I tested it. So it'll be a small outline of which one should it be belong to. Too bad it doesn't have a Speedstep, only C1E is supported. If speedstep is available, the Celeron 420 could have reach even lower wattages! Maybe it'll fall a little bit behind in terms of multitasks because the absence of HT.

For the Aero interface, a newer Intel GMA should work (I think it's the 9000 series!) or any cards equivalent or better than Geforce FX5200, which is the minimum one.

Hope that helps!

For the lightning arrestor - try the Cal-Lab. For the PC - you might need a UPS or a AVR.
__________________
Intel Core 2 Duo E7200, 2GB DDR2-667 RAM, Gigabyte 945GCMX-S2, Sapphire ATi Radeon HD4850 512MB DDR3

Intel Pentium Dual Core E2140, 2GB DDR2-667 RAM, Asus P5B-E Plus, nVidia Geforce 7950GT 512MB DDR3

The_YongGrand is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd Aug 2007, 02:52 PM   #29 (permalink)
Newbie
 
Join Date: 20 Aug 2007
Posts: 16
Reputation: 0
firefly is an unknown quantity at this point
Rep Power: 0
Default YongGrand .. you rock!!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by The_YongGrand View Post
Hello and welcome!

Well the Celeron 420 (note the absence of D - it's for the older Cedar Mill and Prescott cores only) is quite a good buy if it's much cheaper! Yes the Celeron 420 is a very ideal one for HTPC and BT rig since it involves only a mere 35Ws. If you don't believe it - the heatsink of Celeron 4xx series are 1/2 of the size of the original stock 775 heatsink. But the thing is, the price of AMD X2 3600+ (not sure whether it is still sold!) looks tempting enough for you to buy that one instead of the Celeron 420. And the Athlons are also equipped with Cool and Quiet, so the throttling of speed will be even less than 35W for the Athlons. The Single-core Athlons are equipped with the same feature too, and it'll not be a worry for you since the performance of both 1-core Athlons64 and Celeron 4xx are almost the same.

The performance of Celeron 420 is comparable to Pentium 4 531 - I tested it. So it'll be a small outline of which one should it be belong to. Too bad it doesn't have a Speedstep, only C1E is supported. If speedstep is available, the Celeron 420 could have reach even lower wattages! Maybe it'll fall a little bit behind in terms of multitasks because the absence of HT.

For the Aero interface, a newer Intel GMA should work (I think it's the 9000 series!) or any cards equivalent or better than Geforce FX5200, which is the minimum one.

Hope that helps!

For the lightning arrestor - try the Cal-Lab. For the PC - you might need a UPS or a AVR.

Hi YongGrand,

Thank you so much for such a prompt reply and those useful info. Truly appreciate your input ...

Actually, there is this promo between Citibank, HP and TMnet .. and HP is giving this Compaq Presario SR5122CF CTO Desktop PC for the RM99 per month package.

Below is the full spec of this PC.


Model Number SR5120CF
Product Number GN672AA
Sku Status
Microprocessor Intel® Celeron® processor 420
1.6GHz, 512KB L2 Cache, EM64T, Execute Disable Bit, 800Mhz FSB
Processor Bus Speed 800MHz
Cache 512KB Advanced Transfer Cache
Chipset Intel® 945GC Express Chipset
Memory 512MB DDR2
Expandability expandable up to 2.0 GB with discard
Memory Speed PC2-4200 / 533MHz
Total Memory Slots 2 DIMM
Available Memory Slots 1 DIMM
Audio Integrated Intel High Definition Audio, 5.1 Surround Sound Ready
Hard Drive 80.0 GB * Serial ATA hard drive at 7200RPM *Gigabyte(GB) is defined as 1 billion bytes
Optical Drive 1 CD-RW/DVD Combo Drive (48x32x48x16x)
CD: 48x write; 32x-rewrite; 48x read max speed
DVD: 16x read max speed
Optical Drive 2 None
Video Graphics Intel® GMA 950 Graphics
Video Memory Up to 64MB shared memory
Communication None
Wireless LAN None
Tv Tuner None
Remote Control Module None
Networking Integrated 10/100 BaseT network interface (Broadband Ready)
Digital Media Reader None
Front Access None
Rear Access 2 USB 2.0, 2 PS/2, Line-in, Line-out, Mic-in, LAN
Keyboard Compaq Multimedia Easy Access Internet Keyboard
Mouse Compaq Optical, 2-button PS2 scroller mouse
Total Expansion Slots 1 PCI Express (x16), 1 PCI Express (x1), 2 PCI
Available Slots 1 PCI Express (x16), 1 PCI Express (x1), 2 PCI
Total Drive Bays External (2) 5.25", (2) 3.5"; Internal (2) 3.5"
Available Bays External (1) 5.25", (2) 3.5";
Service And Support 1 year (onsite) limited warranty with up-and-running phone support for first 30 days
LOGO
Vista Logo Free DOS Operating System
Platform brand (Intel Viiv or AMD Live) None
OS & SOFTWARE None
Operating System None
Productivity & Finance None
None
Encyclopedia None
Home Entertainment None
Entertainment None
None
None
Games None
Media Burning & Video Editing Software None
Digital Photography None
Video Editing Software None
Video Editing Software None
Internet & online None
Anti-Virus Software None
PC Help & Recovery PC Doctor
PC Help & Recovery None
PC Help & Recovery None
PC Help & Recovery None
PC Help & Recovery None


Umm .. what do you think about this spec? Any good?

Honestly, I am OK with it .. except the casing doesn't come with a front panel, i.e. I won't have any USB ports in front of the PC. Gosh .. this will be so inconvenient for me .. coz my room is small .. and the CPU is planned to be hidden underneth my table. Imagine I will need to take the CPU out each time I need to use the USB port at the back. Oh boy .. it's not going to be pleasant!!!

Don't know why HP is so cheapskate to remove the front panel. My friend got his HP PC through the TMnet promo in June .. and his model comes with a front panel ...

So, I was wondering .. is there a way to add the front panel later .. through DIY? I understand the front panel comes with the casing .. hmm .. do they sell separately on this? Is it difficult to install? Care to advise?

Also, was thinking to install Windows Vista Home Premium on this PC. Do you think this will be a wise move? Or, I shall stick with Windows XP Pro SP2. Hmm .. but kinda bored with XP and wish to experience the new Vista. But .. heard a lot of bad things about it wor ... ummm ...
firefly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd Aug 2007, 02:56 PM   #30 (permalink)
Administrator
 
Chai's Avatar
 
Join Date: 6 Oct 2002
Location: Maranello
Posts: 28,113
Reputation: 4649
Chai has a reputation beyond reputeChai has a reputation beyond reputeChai has a reputation beyond reputeChai has a reputation beyond reputeChai has a reputation beyond reputeChai has a reputation beyond reputeChai has a reputation beyond reputeChai has a reputation beyond reputeChai has a reputation beyond reputeChai has a reputation beyond reputeChai has a reputation beyond repute
Rep Power: 82
Default

Maybe you should create a new thread. This is about PC Power Management.
__________________
Chai (Contributor & Forum Admin)
http://www.techarp.com/
Chai is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
BIOS Optimization Guide Revision 10.8 Adrian Wong BIOS Optimization Guide (BOG) 156 2nd Aug 2009 08:44 PM
AMD's Griffin Flies to the Fore Dashken News 1 16th Jun 2007 01:51 AM
OCZ and PC Power & Cooling Join Forces to Revolutionize Power Management Dashken News 0 31st May 2007 12:21 AM


All times are GMT +8. The time now is 10:02 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.1.0
Copyright © 1998-2009 Tech ARP. All rights reserved.