![]() |
| | #122 (permalink) | |
| Da Boss Join Date: 10 Oct 2002 Location: In front of my ASUS F8V notebook!
Posts: 30,124
Reputation: 3081 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Rep Power: 67 | Quote:
__________________ Dr. Adrian Wong Tech ARP | Blog @ Tech ARP | The Free Trade Zone DYKT : The only offshore account I have is at the sand bank? Keep Tech ARP free! Visit our sponsors! We need PROGRAMMERS and TECHNICAL WRITERS! Contact us if you are a hot shot programmer or technical writer! My items for sale : 50x SD Card | Memory Stick PRO | Cyclone Energy Saver | Seiko SS watch | Tiger/Carlsberg beer jugs | Travel Speakers | Motorola V600 | Nokia N90 SOLD! | New Lowepro Mini Trekker AW Other items for sale @ the FTZ : Zalman CNPS9500 LED @ $20 | Zalman CNPS7700 Cu @ $20 | Zalman CNPS7000 Cu @ $20 | Swarovski bracelet watches | Dell 17" LCD | Hi-Fi speakers | English DIVX movies | HP LaserJet toners! | Office chairs | |
| | |
| | #123 (permalink) | |
| Administrator! Join Date: 21 Apr 2003 Location: Penang
Posts: 29,758
Reputation: 2162 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Rep Power: 56 | graysky had just updated the Intel performance table. It now contains several quad-core Yorkfield ES chips including Xeon E5330 (Dual CPU - 8 cores), Q9550 and Q9350. The x264 benchmark measures how fast your machine can encode a short, DVD quality MPEG-2 video clip into a high-quality x264 video clip. It will give you results in FPS that can be used to compare the performance of different CPUs and different CPU settings. Here's a quote from the article :- Quote:
Link : x264 Benchmark Results Updated
__________________ | Intel Core 2 Duo E6850 @ 3.2Ghz | ASUS P5B-E Plus | G.SKILL 2x1GB DDR2 800 | 6 HDDs (2TB+ only ![]() Blog : Dashken's I-Blog Gallery : Dashken's I-Paintings Last edited by Dashken : 15th Mar 2008 at 06:33 PM. | |
| | |
| | #124 (permalink) |
| Getting there Join Date: 18 Aug 2007
Posts: 167
Reputation: 249 ![]() ![]() ![]() Rep Power: 4 | Updated the tables with another 45 nm chip: the QX9650 -- both at stock levels and @ overclocked to 4.2 GHz! With it, and the others (Xeon E5330 (Dual board), Q9550, and Q9350) there is now data on 4 different 45 nm chips. One thing that I found striking about these new chips is that they are only marginally faster than their 65 nm counterparts when encoding x264 (about 5-6 % faster with all other factors being equal or close to equal). Have a look at the general trends table for the Kentsfield vs. Yorkfield comparison at the official host. |
| | |
| | #125 (permalink) |
| Newbie Join Date: 21 Nov 2007
Posts: 1
Reputation: 0 ![]() Rep Power: 0 | RD 600 E6850@423X9 2X1 gig SYNC 4,4,4,14 Win XP32 home ---------- RUN1PASS1.LOG encoded 1749 frames, 105.60 fps, 1850.89 kb/s ---------- RUN2PASS1.LOG encoded 1749 frames, 106.41 fps, 1850.89 kb/s ---------- RUN3PASS1.LOG encoded 1749 frames, 105.70 fps, 1850.89 kb/s ---------- RUN4PASS1.LOG encoded 1749 frames, 106.10 fps, 1850.89 kb/s ---------- RUN5PASS1.LOG encoded 1749 frames, 106.20 fps, 1850.89 kb/s ---------- RUN1PASS2.LOG encoded 1749 frames, 26.29 fps, 1826.37 kb/s ---------- RUN2PASS2.LOG encoded 1749 frames, 26.47 fps, 1826.37 kb/s ---------- RUN3PASS2.LOG encoded 1749 frames, 26.43 fps, 1826.37 kb/s ---------- RUN4PASS2.LOG encoded 1749 frames, 26.34 fps, 1826.38 kb/s ---------- RUN5PASS2.LOG encoded 1749 frames, 26.33 fps, 1826.37 kb/s Last edited by learners permit : 21st Nov 2007 at 03:49 PM. |
| | |
| | #126 (permalink) |
| Pickin' Da Gitfiddle Join Date: 19 Nov 2007 Location: Canada
Posts: 2,048
Reputation: 802 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Rep Power: 12 | Hey guys tried this out and maybe I am missing something or its too early and I haven't had enough Java yet I copied the file DGDecode.dll to the C:\Program Files\AviSynth 2.5\plugins directory as indicated in the instructions. I run the program and enter the file name when prompted but when I hit enter the screen just closes. Running XP Pro SP2 any ideas ? |
| | |
| | #127 (permalink) | |
| Getting there Join Date: 18 Aug 2007
Posts: 167
Reputation: 249 ![]() ![]() ![]() Rep Power: 4 | Quote:
Tech ARP - x264 Benchmark | |
| | |
| | #128 (permalink) |
| Newbie Join Date: 21 Nov 2007
Posts: 1
Reputation: 0 ![]() Rep Power: 0 | not too bad if i do say so myself. still better than some of the newer entry level Intel chips! XP Pro SP2 X2 4400+ @ 2650 @ 1.5v 2GB Mushkin Redline 99142 @ 265x10 w/ 3-3-2-8 2T @ 2.7v ---------- RUN1PASS1.LOG encoded 1749 frames, 69.87 fps, 1850.89 kb/s ---------- RUN2PASS1.LOG encoded 1749 frames, 70.35 fps, 1850.89 kb/s ---------- RUN3PASS1.LOG encoded 1749 frames, 70.71 fps, 1850.89 kb/s ---------- RUN4PASS1.LOG encoded 1749 frames, 70.93 fps, 1850.89 kb/s ---------- RUN5PASS1.LOG encoded 1749 frames, 70.75 fps, 1850.89 kb/s ---------- RUN1PASS2.LOG encoded 1749 frames, 16.91 fps, 1826.38 kb/s ---------- RUN2PASS2.LOG encoded 1749 frames, 17.14 fps, 1826.20 kb/s ---------- RUN3PASS2.LOG encoded 1749 frames, 17.27 fps, 1826.38 kb/s ---------- RUN4PASS2.LOG encoded 1749 frames, 17.30 fps, 1826.38 kb/s ---------- RUN5PASS2.LOG encoded 1749 frames, 17.27 fps, 1826.37 kb/s Last edited by Russianblue : 21st Nov 2007 at 11:17 PM. |
| | |
| | #129 (permalink) | |
| Pickin' Da Gitfiddle Join Date: 19 Nov 2007 Location: Canada
Posts: 2,048
Reputation: 802 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Rep Power: 12 | Quote:
EDIT: That worked like a charm now just need to find time to run it Last edited by Mac Daddy : 22nd Nov 2007 at 08:42 PM. | |
| | |
| | #130 (permalink) |
| Pickin' Da Gitfiddle Join Date: 19 Nov 2007 Location: Canada
Posts: 2,048
Reputation: 802 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Rep Power: 12 | Well ran this dead stock for reference on this old Prescott 2.8 (21x133) let it run after I went to bed. The numbers I am sure won't impress anyone but like the test. I will set things back up the way I normally run and run it again tonight if I get a chance ---------- RUN1PASS1.LOG encoded 1749 frames, 15.83 fps, 1854.10 kb/s ---------- RUN2PASS1.LOG encoded 1749 frames, 15.92 fps, 1854.10 kb/s ---------- RUN3PASS1.LOG encoded 1749 frames, 16.05 fps, 1854.10 kb/s ---------- RUN4PASS1.LOG encoded 1749 frames, 15.83 fps, 1854.10 kb/s ---------- RUN5PASS1.LOG encoded 1749 frames, 15.99 fps, 1854.10 kb/s ---------- RUN1PASS2.LOG encoded 1749 frames, 3.39 fps, 1825.89 kb/s ---------- RUN2PASS2.LOG encoded 1749 frames, 3.36 fps, 1825.89 kb/s ---------- RUN3PASS2.LOG encoded 1749 frames, 3.39 fps, 1825.89 kb/s ---------- RUN4PASS2.LOG encoded 1749 frames, 3.38 fps, 1825.89 kb/s ---------- RUN5PASS2.LOG encoded 1749 frames, 3.35 fps, 1825.89 kb/s |
| | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Real World Testing vs Benchmark Testing | Chai | General Software | 30 | 26th Jul 2006 11:46 AM |