x264 Benchmark - Page 19

graysky · 9th Mar 2008, 01:41 AM

Thanks for the result dude... I see you ran the yet-to-be-released HD version of the benchmark. Where'd you get your hands on a C1 stepping q9450? Another important question is how high does it clock? I'm itching to get one along with a new X38 based board but my fear is that I'd have to pump the FSB too high.

kpfong · 9th Mar 2008, 01:41 AM

CPU: Athlon X2 BE-2300 9.5X200
Chipset: ID9600 (780G)
Mem: 5-5-5-18@380
OS: Vista Home

---------- RUN1PASS1.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 48.14 fps, 1850.89 kb/s

---------- RUN2PASS1.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 49.46 fps, 1850.89 kb/s

---------- RUN3PASS1.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 49.33 fps, 1850.89 kb/s

---------- RUN4PASS1.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 50.64 fps, 1850.89 kb/s

---------- RUN5PASS1.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 50.32 fps, 1850.89 kb/s

---------- RUN1PASS2.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 11.93 fps, 1826.37 kb/s

---------- RUN2PASS2.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 11.85 fps, 1826.37 kb/s

---------- RUN3PASS2.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 12.08 fps, 1826.37 kb/s

---------- RUN4PASS2.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 12.15 fps, 1826.37 kb/s

---------- RUN5PASS2.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 12.13 fps, 1826.37 kb/s

graysky · 9th Mar 2008, 02:06 AM

Thanks for the results kpfong. Adding to the tables shortly.

cEvin Ki · 9th Mar 2008, 12:01 PM

---------- RUN1PASS1.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 161.76 fps, 1850.94 kb/s

---------- RUN2PASS1.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 162.47 fps, 1850.94 kb/s

---------- RUN3PASS1.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 161.99 fps, 1850.94 kb/s

---------- RUN4PASS1.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 162.46 fps, 1850.94 kb/s

---------- RUN5PASS1.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 162.47 fps, 1850.94 kb/s

---------- RUN1PASS2.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 42.77 fps, 1829.43 kb/s

---------- RUN2PASS2.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 42.85 fps, 1829.29 kb/s

---------- RUN3PASS2.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 42.86 fps, 1829.12 kb/s

---------- RUN4PASS2.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 42.79 fps, 1829.32 kb/s

---------- RUN5PASS2.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 42.64 fps, 1829.32 kb/s

C2 Q6600 Kentsfield
333x9
DDR2 1:1 @667 3-3-3-8
X38
XP32 Pro SP2

graysky · 9th Mar 2008, 05:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cEvin Ki

<data snipped>

C2 Q6600 Kentsfield
333x9
DDR2 1:1 @667 3-3-3-8
X38
XP32 Pro SP2

Thanks dude... C2 stepping???

silentbob343 · 10th Mar 2008, 07:58 AM

my results

WinXP Pro w/SP2:

Quote:

---------- RUN1PASS1.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 23.61 fps, 1854.10 kb/s

---------- RUN2PASS1.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 24.83 fps, 1854.10 kb/s

---------- RUN3PASS1.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 24.92 fps, 1854.10 kb/s

---------- RUN4PASS1.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 24.69 fps, 1854.10 kb/s

---------- RUN5PASS1.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 24.83 fps, 1854.10 kb/s

---------- RUN1PASS2.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 5.99 fps, 1825.89 kb/s

---------- RUN2PASS2.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 6.18 fps, 1825.89 kb/s

---------- RUN3PASS2.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 6.18 fps, 1825.89 kb/s

---------- RUN4PASS2.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 6.17 fps, 1825.89 kb/s

---------- RUN5PASS2.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 6.17 fps, 1825.89 kb/s

cEvin Ki · 10th Mar 2008, 08:14 AM

@graysky

hehe, no. sorry for the confusion. that was "core 2", but i suppose that wasn't even necessary to include, as there is only one q6600! i'm a doof at times.....

no, it's a G0 stepping.

Dashken · 10th Mar 2008, 08:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by graysky

Thanks for the result dude... I see you ran the yet-to-be-released HD version of the benchmark. Where'd you get your hands on a C1 stepping q9450? Another important question is how high does it clock? I'm itching to get one along with a new X38 based board but my fear is that I'd have to pump the FSB too high.

Hihi... I wish I can overclock it but unfortunately it's not mine.

So, overclocking it would be impossible with the BIOS available.

kpfong · 14th Mar 2008, 11:57 PM

CPU: Athlon X2 BE2300@200MHz X 9.5
RAM: 5-5-5-18@380MHz
Chipset: 690G
OS: vista home 32

---------- RUN1PASS1.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 42.38 fps, 1850.89 kb/s

---------- RUN2PASS1.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 43.64 fps, 1850.89 kb/s

---------- RUN3PASS1.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 45.46 fps, 1850.89 kb/s

---------- RUN4PASS1.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 47.45 fps, 1850.89 kb/s

---------- RUN5PASS1.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 47.25 fps, 1850.89 kb/s

---------- RUN1PASS2.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 10.68 fps, 1826.37 kb/s

---------- RUN2PASS2.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 11.08 fps, 1826.21 kb/s

---------- RUN3PASS2.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 11.43 fps, 1826.37 kb/s

---------- RUN4PASS2.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 11.34 fps, 1826.37 kb/s

---------- RUN5PASS2.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 11.21 fps, 1826.37 kb/s

Same CPU / RAM / OS with 780G setup.... seems 780 gives better result.....

graysky · 15th Mar 2008, 06:20 AM

Cool man, I'll update the tables shortly.

9th Mar 2008, 01:41 AM	#181 (permalink)
graysky Getting there Join Date: 18 Aug 2007 Posts: 167 Reputation: 249 Rep Power: 4	Thanks for the result dude... I see you ran the yet-to-be-released HD version of the benchmark. Where'd you get your hands on a C1 stepping q9450? Another important question is how high does it clock? I'm itching to get one along with a new X38 based board but my fear is that I'd have to pump the FSB too high. __________________ http://encoding.n3.net <--- for all your DVD and audio CD backup needs! Last edited by graysky : 9th Mar 2008 at 01:59 AM.

9th Mar 2008, 02:06 AM	#183 (permalink)
graysky Getting there Join Date: 18 Aug 2007 Posts: 167 Reputation: 249 Rep Power: 4	Thanks for the results kpfong. Adding to the tables shortly. __________________ http://encoding.n3.net <--- for all your DVD and audio CD backup needs!

15th Mar 2008, 06:20 AM	#190 (permalink)
graysky Getting there Join Date: 18 Aug 2007 Posts: 167 Reputation: 249 Rep Power: 4	Cool man, I'll update the tables shortly. __________________ http://encoding.n3.net <--- for all your DVD and audio CD backup needs!

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Real World Testing vs Benchmark Testing	Chai	General Software	30	26th Jul 2006 11:46 AM

9th Mar 2008, 01:41 AM	#182 (permalink)
kpfong Newbie Join Date: 18 Jan 2008 Posts: 13 Reputation: 0 Rep Power: 0	CPU: Athlon X2 BE-2300 9.5X200 Chipset: ID9600 (780G) Mem: 5-5-5-18@380 OS: Vista Home ---------- RUN1PASS1.LOG encoded 1749 frames, 48.14 fps, 1850.89 kb/s ---------- RUN2PASS1.LOG encoded 1749 frames, 49.46 fps, 1850.89 kb/s ---------- RUN3PASS1.LOG encoded 1749 frames, 49.33 fps, 1850.89 kb/s ---------- RUN4PASS1.LOG encoded 1749 frames, 50.64 fps, 1850.89 kb/s ---------- RUN5PASS1.LOG encoded 1749 frames, 50.32 fps, 1850.89 kb/s ---------- RUN1PASS2.LOG encoded 1749 frames, 11.93 fps, 1826.37 kb/s ---------- RUN2PASS2.LOG encoded 1749 frames, 11.85 fps, 1826.37 kb/s ---------- RUN3PASS2.LOG encoded 1749 frames, 12.08 fps, 1826.37 kb/s ---------- RUN4PASS2.LOG encoded 1749 frames, 12.15 fps, 1826.37 kb/s ---------- RUN5PASS2.LOG encoded 1749 frames, 12.13 fps, 1826.37 kb/s

9th Mar 2008, 12:01 PM	#184 (permalink)
cEvin Ki Newbie Join Date: 9 Mar 2008 Posts: 4 Reputation: 0 Rep Power: 0	---------- RUN1PASS1.LOG encoded 1749 frames, 161.76 fps, 1850.94 kb/s ---------- RUN2PASS1.LOG encoded 1749 frames, 162.47 fps, 1850.94 kb/s ---------- RUN3PASS1.LOG encoded 1749 frames, 161.99 fps, 1850.94 kb/s ---------- RUN4PASS1.LOG encoded 1749 frames, 162.46 fps, 1850.94 kb/s ---------- RUN5PASS1.LOG encoded 1749 frames, 162.47 fps, 1850.94 kb/s ---------- RUN1PASS2.LOG encoded 1749 frames, 42.77 fps, 1829.43 kb/s ---------- RUN2PASS2.LOG encoded 1749 frames, 42.85 fps, 1829.29 kb/s ---------- RUN3PASS2.LOG encoded 1749 frames, 42.86 fps, 1829.12 kb/s ---------- RUN4PASS2.LOG encoded 1749 frames, 42.79 fps, 1829.32 kb/s ---------- RUN5PASS2.LOG encoded 1749 frames, 42.64 fps, 1829.32 kb/s C2 Q6600 Kentsfield 333x9 DDR2 1:1 @667 3-3-3-8 X38 XP32 Pro SP2

10th Mar 2008, 08:14 AM	#187 (permalink)
cEvin Ki Newbie Join Date: 9 Mar 2008 Posts: 4 Reputation: 0 Rep Power: 0	@graysky hehe, no. sorry for the confusion. that was "core 2", but i suppose that wasn't even necessary to include, as there is only one q6600! i'm a doof at times..... no, it's a G0 stepping.

14th Mar 2008, 11:57 PM	#189 (permalink)
kpfong Newbie Join Date: 18 Jan 2008 Posts: 13 Reputation: 0 Rep Power: 0	CPU: Athlon X2 BE2300@200MHz X 9.5 RAM: 5-5-5-18@380MHz Chipset: 690G OS: vista home 32 ---------- RUN1PASS1.LOG encoded 1749 frames, 42.38 fps, 1850.89 kb/s ---------- RUN2PASS1.LOG encoded 1749 frames, 43.64 fps, 1850.89 kb/s ---------- RUN3PASS1.LOG encoded 1749 frames, 45.46 fps, 1850.89 kb/s ---------- RUN4PASS1.LOG encoded 1749 frames, 47.45 fps, 1850.89 kb/s ---------- RUN5PASS1.LOG encoded 1749 frames, 47.25 fps, 1850.89 kb/s ---------- RUN1PASS2.LOG encoded 1749 frames, 10.68 fps, 1826.37 kb/s ---------- RUN2PASS2.LOG encoded 1749 frames, 11.08 fps, 1826.21 kb/s ---------- RUN3PASS2.LOG encoded 1749 frames, 11.43 fps, 1826.37 kb/s ---------- RUN4PASS2.LOG encoded 1749 frames, 11.34 fps, 1826.37 kb/s ---------- RUN5PASS2.LOG encoded 1749 frames, 11.21 fps, 1826.37 kb/s Same CPU / RAM / OS with 780G setup.... seems 780 gives better result.....