![]() | ![]() |
| Register | |||||||
| Reviews & Articles There will be a post for every Tech ARP article. Come in here to discuss about your favourite article! |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools |
| | #1 (permalink) | |
| Administrator! Join Date: 21 Apr 2003 Location: Penang
Posts: 30,127
Reputation: 2324 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Rep Power: 60 | The x264 HD Benchmark is the “High Definition version” of the x264 Benchmark which has become a standard CPU benchmark for Tech ARP as well as many other hardware enthusiasts. The new x264 HD Benchmark ups the ante by using a new 720p24 high-definition video clip. Therefore, it will be a great test of the processor’s ability to encode HD quality video streams. Give it a try and let us know how your processor fares! Here's a quote from the article :- Quote:
Link : x264 HD Benchmark
__________________ | Intel Core 2 Duo E6850 @ 3.2Ghz | ASUS P5B-E Plus | G.SKILL 2x1GB DDR2 800 | 6 HDDs (2TB+ only ![]() Blog : Dashken's I-Blog Gallery : Dashken's I-Paintings | |
| | |
| SPONSOR |
| |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| Pickin' Da Gitfiddle Join Date: 19 Nov 2007 Location: Canada
Posts: 2,049
Reputation: 802 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Rep Power: 12 | Cool stuff I am still awaiting my viddy card for the new system and will run both X264 tests stock and O/C Dashken. I tell everyone about this as I feel it is one of the only true CPU benchmarking tests out there Cheers Graysky |
| | |
| | #3 (permalink) |
| Newbie Join Date: 15 Mar 2008
Posts: 1
Reputation: 0 ![]() Rep Power: 0 | ---------- RUN1PASS1.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 82.25 fps, 3904.94 kb/s ---------- RUN2PASS1.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 82.11 fps, 3904.94 kb/s ---------- RUN3PASS1.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 81.82 fps, 3904.94 kb/s ---------- RUN4PASS1.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 81.46 fps, 3904.94 kb/s ---------- RUN1PASS2.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 41.24 fps, 3974.08 kb/s ---------- RUN2PASS2.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 41.22 fps, 3974.08 kb/s ---------- RUN3PASS2.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 41.14 fps, 3974.08 kb/s ---------- RUN4PASS2.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 41.24 fps, 3974.08 kb/s Spec is Intel Skultrail D5400XS, i5400 express chipset Intel Xeon X5460 o/c 3.8GHz (9.5x400) 8GB DDR2 FB-DIMM 800MHz 5-5-5-18 Vista Ultimate x64 |
| | |
| | #4 (permalink) | |
| Getting there Join Date: 18 Aug 2007
Posts: 175
Reputation: 249 ![]() ![]() ![]() Rep Power: 4 | Cool man, judging by your results, they must be for the HD benchmark, no? I would think that system would give much higher values for the SD benchmark. Can a mod please move his reply to the HD benchmark section to avoid confusion? Thanks and thanks for the results! Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #6 (permalink) |
| Newbie Join Date: 16 Mar 2008
Posts: 1
Reputation: 0 ![]() Rep Power: 0 | ---------- RUN1PASS1.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 26.57 fps, 3905.08 kb/s ---------- RUN2PASS1.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 26.46 fps, 3905.08 kb/s ---------- RUN3PASS1.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 26.03 fps, 3905.08 kb/s ---------- RUN4PASS1.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 26.49 fps, 3905.08 kb/s ---------- RUN1PASS2.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 6.25 fps, 3942.92 kb/s ---------- RUN2PASS2.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 6.31 fps, 3942.92 kb/s ---------- RUN3PASS2.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 6.30 fps, 3942.92 kb/s ---------- RUN4PASS2.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 6.29 fps, 3942.92 kb/s X2 5200+ (Windsor F2), 13x200 2GB@742MHz DDR2 4-4-3-8 ATI Xpress 3200 (RD580), Vista Ultimate 32-bit |
| | |
| | #8 (permalink) |
| Newbie Join Date: 16 Mar 2008
Posts: 1
Reputation: 0 ![]() Rep Power: 0 | ---------- RUN1PASS1.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 27.22 fps, 3905.08 kb/s ---------- RUN2PASS1.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 32.68 fps, 3905.08 kb/s ---------- RUN3PASS1.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 32.20 fps, 3905.08 kb/s ---------- RUN4PASS1.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 32.18 fps, 3905.08 kb/s ---------- RUN1PASS2.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 8.02 fps, 3942.92 kb/s ---------- RUN2PASS2.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 8.03 fps, 3942.92 kb/s ---------- RUN3PASS2.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 8.02 fps, 3942.92 kb/s ---------- RUN4PASS2.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 8.03 fps, 3942.92 kb/s E6600 Conroe @ 2.88 GHz 9*320 G965 DDR2 960Mhz 5-5-5-18 FSB Windows XP x86 SP2 Cheers, Martin |
| | |
| | #9 (permalink) |
| Newbie Join Date: 16 Mar 2008 Location: Poland
Posts: 2
Reputation: 0 ![]() Rep Power: 0 | ---------- RUN1PASS1.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 31.90 fps, 3905.08 kb/s ---------- RUN2PASS1.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 31.99 fps, 3905.08 kb/s ---------- RUN3PASS1.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 31.92 fps, 3905.08 kb/s ---------- RUN4PASS1.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 31.88 fps, 3905.08 kb/s ---------- RUN1PASS2.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 8.13 fps, 3942.92 kb/s ---------- RUN2PASS2.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 8.14 fps, 3942.92 kb/s ---------- RUN3PASS2.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 8.14 fps, 3942.92 kb/s ---------- RUN4PASS2.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 8.15 fps, 3942.92 kb/s C2D E8200 (Wolfdale), 8x340, X38, DDR2, 5-5-5-18 @ 510 MHz (FSB:DRAM 2:3) XP Pro SP2 32-bit Cheers |
| | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| x264 Benchmark | Dashken | Reviews & Articles | 210 | 15th Mar 2009 12:54 PM |
| Nvidia GeForce 9800 GX2 Benchmark & Review | ChampionLLY | Reviews & Articles | 5 | 5th Mar 2008 11:05 PM |
| Memory bandwidth tests... any real differences (PC4300 vs. PC7100) | graysky | Processors, Motherboards & Memory | 2 | 1st Nov 2007 03:15 PM |