Desktop Graphics Card Comparison Guide - Page 28

Vecix · 24th May 2007, 01:03 AM

I think that you have swapped the Fill Rate between GeForce 6800 GT and Geforce 6800 GTO.

Cheers

Adrian Wong · 24th May 2007, 10:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vecix

I think that you have swapped the Fill Rate between GeForce 6800 GT and Geforce 6800 GTO.

Cheers

Oops! You are right! Thanks for letting us know.

Dashken · 24th May 2007, 10:49 PM

The guide has just been updated!

Covering over 300 desktop graphics cards, this comprehensive comparison allows you to easily compare 18 different specifications for each and every card. If you need to find out about the specification of any card, just come over and check out our Desktop Graphics Comparison Guide.

We hope it will prove to be a useful reference. We will keep this guide updated regularly so do check back for the latest updates.

Here are the updates:-

Quote:

- Corrected the Fill Rate specifications for the NVIDIA GeForce 6800 GT and 6800 GTO graphics cards.
- Total cards : 308

Link : Desktop Graphics Card Comparison Guide Rev. 12.71

Vecix · 25th May 2007, 05:42 AM

It's correct the value of Fill Rate of HD 2900 XT? As I can see your reckoning is 742x16=11.872 Mtexels.

16 is the number of ROPs, HD 2900 can make 2 textures by clock as I can see in Textures / clock Row, so Fill Rate must be 742x32=23.744 Mtexels. Or I'm in a mistake or Fillrate of HD 2600 XT must be the half that you are posting.

Thanks for your great work!, it's the best VGA database... to inspire in card decisions or make reviews.

Ferran Veciana
Noticias3D.com

Max_87 · 25th May 2007, 10:12 AM

Thanks, glad that you find it useful

HD 2900 XT does 16 textures per clock
http://www.beyond3d.com/content/reviews/16/2
http://techreport.com/reviews/2007q2...t/index.x?pg=4

and if you look at the 3DMark06 fill rate results:
http://techreport.com/reviews/2007q2...-3dm-multi.gif
it is quite close to the theoritical fill rate which we have calculated (742x16=11.872 MTexels/s)

Edit: It's supposed to be 16 texture/clock, we made a typo error in the table

Adrian Wong · 25th May 2007, 10:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vecix

It's correct the value of Fill Rate of HD 2900 XT? As I can see your reckoning is 742x16=11.872 Mtexels.

16 is the number of ROPs, HD 2900 can make 2 textures by clock as I can see in Textures / clock Row, so Fill Rate must be 742x32=23.744 Mtexels. Or I'm in a mistake or Fillrate of HD 2600 XT must be the half that you are posting.

Thanks for your great work!, it's the best VGA database... to inspire in card decisions or make reviews.

Ferran Veciana
Noticias3D.com

Whoops. Another typo. It actually processes 16 textures per clock, so the Fill Rate is correct. Will correct the mistake ASAP. Thanks!

Dashken · 26th May 2007, 09:55 PM

The article has just been updated!

Covering over 300 desktop graphics cards, this comprehensive comparison allows you to easily compare 18 different specifications for each and every card. If you need to find out about the specification of any card, just come over and check out our Desktop Graphics Comparison Guide.

We hope it will prove to be a useful reference. We will keep this guide updated regularly so do check back for the latest updates.

Link : Desktop Graphics Card Comparison Guide Rev. 12.72

goldfries · 5th Jul 2007, 02:26 PM

curious - why is X195O Pro DDR4? AFAIK there are (if not, many) DDR3 versions out there.

zy · 5th Jul 2007, 03:06 PM

http://ati.amd.com/products/RadeonX1...pro_specs.html

ermm memory speed guys ?

and how come 1950XT isnt up on the list ?

zy · 5th Jul 2007, 03:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by goldfries

curious - why is X195O Pro DDR4? AFAIK there are (if not, many) DDR3 versions out there.

i think there is no DDR4 version ...

24th May 2007, 01:03 AM	#271 (permalink)
Vecix Newbie Join Date: 24 May 2007 Posts: 5 Reputation: 114 Rep Power: 0	mistake? I think that you have swapped the Fill Rate between GeForce 6800 GT and Geforce 6800 GTO. Cheers

25th May 2007, 05:42 AM	#274 (permalink)
Vecix Newbie Join Date: 24 May 2007 Posts: 5 Reputation: 114 Rep Power: 0	Incorrect Fill Rate HD 2900 XT? It's correct the value of Fill Rate of HD 2900 XT? As I can see your reckoning is 742x16=11.872 Mtexels. 16 is the number of ROPs, HD 2900 can make 2 textures by clock as I can see in Textures / clock Row, so Fill Rate must be 742x32=23.744 Mtexels. Or I'm in a mistake or Fillrate of HD 2600 XT must be the half that you are posting. Thanks for your great work!, it's the best VGA database... to inspire in card decisions or make reviews. Ferran Veciana Noticias3D.com

25th May 2007, 10:12 AM	#275 (permalink)
Max_87 h@x! Join Date: 11 Aug 2003 Location: the land of bandwidth cap Posts: 11,430 Reputation: 2090 Rep Power: 38	Thanks, glad that you find it useful HD 2900 XT does 16 textures per clock http://www.beyond3d.com/content/reviews/16/2 http://techreport.com/reviews/2007q2...t/index.x?pg=4 and if you look at the 3DMark06 fill rate results: http://techreport.com/reviews/2007q2...-3dm-multi.gif it is quite close to the theoritical fill rate which we have calculated (742x16=11.872 MTexels/s) Edit: It's supposed to be 16 texture/clock, we made a typo error in the table __________________ Max_87 Tech ARP http://www.techarp.com Dell Studio 15 / P7350 / 3GB DDR2 / Radeon HD 3450 / 250GB 7200RPM / 15" @ 1920x1200 E8600 @ 4.4GHz 1.36v / Asus P5E3 Deluxe / 2x2GB DDR3 / Radeon X1800 / Barracuda 7200.9 120GB / 7200.10 320GB x2 / Caviar SE16 WD5000AAKS / WD6400AAKS x2 / Dell 2007FP x2 / Silverstone ST56F Last edited by Max_87 : 25th May 2007 at 10:39 AM.

26th May 2007, 09:55 PM	#277 (permalink)
Dashken Administrator! Join Date: 21 Apr 2003 Location: Penang Posts: 30,231 Reputation: 2352 Rep Power: 60	Desktop Graphics Card Comparison Guide Rev. 12.72 The article has just been updated! Covering over 300 desktop graphics cards, this comprehensive comparison allows you to easily compare 18 different specifications for each and every card. If you need to find out about the specification of any card, just come over and check out our Desktop Graphics Comparison Guide. We hope it will prove to be a useful reference. We will keep this guide updated regularly so do check back for the latest updates. Link : Desktop Graphics Card Comparison Guide Rev. 12.72 __________________ \| Intel Core 2 Duo E6850 @ 3.2Ghz \| ASUS P5B-E Plus \| G.SKILL 2x1GB DDR2 800 \| 6 HDDs (2TB+ only ) \| NVIDIA GeForce 7600GT \| Dell E248WFP 24" Widescreen \| \| Intel C2Q Q9450 \| MSI P45 Neo3-FR \| 2 x 2GB OCZ DDR2 PC2-6400 Gold Edition \| 1 x Seagate 250GB HDD \| 2 x Seagate 750GB HDD \| 3 x Seagate 1TB HDD \| NVIDIA GeForce 9500GT \| Cooler Master CM690 chassis \| Cooler Master eXtreme Power Plus 550W PSU \| Dell E248WFP 24" Widescreen \| Windows 7 Ultimate x64 \| Blog : Dashken's I-Blog Gallery : Dashken's I-Paintings

5th Jul 2007, 02:26 PM	#278 (permalink)
goldfries www.goldfries.com Join Date: 22 Jan 2003 Location: KL/PJ Malaysia Posts: 7,953 Reputation: 539 Rep Power: 19	curious - why is X195O Pro DDR4? AFAIK there are (if not, many) DDR3 versions out there. __________________ no computer specs \| no photography gear list \| no userbars \| no quotes

5th Jul 2007, 03:06 PM	#279 (permalink)
zy Dead Join Date: 16 Dec 2002 Location: Buffalo NY / Penang MY Posts: 13,336 Reputation: 2158 Rep Power: 41	http://ati.amd.com/products/RadeonX1...pro_specs.html ermm memory speed guys ? and how come 1950XT isnt up on the list ? __________________ Last edited by zy : 5th Jul 2007 at 03:18 PM.