dual vs quad core

Discussion in 'Processors, Motherboards & Memory' started by Jingy, Jan 2, 2009.

  1. Jingy

    Jingy Newbie

    well, I'm working out what to get in a new PC and the question of dual Vs quad has reared it's multi-headed self up (but would that be 2 heads or 4?)

    at first I automatically fell into the more = better mind set, but after a good number of hours researching, I'm leaning the opposite way.
    thinking instead that for my needs (basic all around computing) I'd be better off with a dual core with higher GHz.

    a good dual core(namely the Intel Core 2 Duo E8600), with lower power needs, heat output, noise etc and strong all around performance would seem like the right choice for me, BUT...

    would a similar priced/quality quad core be a better investment? since even though not many programs are optimized to really take advantage of more then 2 cores right now, that is likely where things are headed.

    so I thought I'd bring this question to (wo)men wiser then I on the subject, and hopefully get a feel for the current opinions on it.

    do you think the potential long term benefits of a quad core outweigh the more immediate better fit of a simple high GHz dual core?



    [p.s, extra credit for opinions on the GeForce 9600 GT GPU Vs the 9800, and tips on decent audio options]
     
    Last edited: Jan 2, 2009
  2. Max_87

    Max_87 huehuehue

    Just get a dual core. By the time a lot of software can actually take advantage of quad core, the processor will be obsolete anyway. Quad core has been around for a long time and most software still can't take advantage of it (even now).
     
  3. Chai

    Chai Administrator Staff Member

    If you are not overclocking, get the E8500, it's a lot cheaper than E8600.
     
  4. Unixlord

    Unixlord Newbie

    Duals still dominate most tasks and they will always OC higher than their quad counterparts with less cooling and power usage required. The exceptions are encoding and rendering.
     
  5. Jingy

    Jingy Newbie

    ok, so clearly people agree that a dual core is the way to go for anyone who's not going to be doing lots of rendering etc, and that it's not going to change anytime that soon.

    Thanks.

    @Chai:
    no, I wasn't planning on overclocking, which is why I was thinking I'd go with the E8600 over the E8500(which is what I looked at originally), E8500 has 3.16 GHz, and the E8600 is 3.33.
    that seemed worth the price difference to me.
    (plus I'll be buying through a friend with a work discount, so the price difference should be even less)
     
  6. Chai

    Chai Administrator Staff Member

    Oh, the difference is too big over here to get E8600.
     
  7. Max_87

    Max_87 huehuehue

    I heard they are out of stock here :lol:
     
  8. Chai

    Chai Administrator Staff Member

    No thanks to you. :lol:
     
  9. jamesnorman93

    jamesnorman93 Newbie

    yeah, core2duo e6750 2.66GHz @ 3.30GHz :D
     
  10. Adrian Wong

    Adrian Wong Da Boss Staff Member

Share This Page