the problem with the file test-1080p.mpg. presumably dgdecode64 not working correctly with video files encoded in MPEG1.
does not equal the test DGDecode32.dll = v.1.5.0.0 DGDecode64.dll = v.1.5.8.0 download from 05-Jan-2011:...
We did not test the quality of video compression, and CPU power. The artifacts on the original video does not matter, but on the contrary -...
Yes, download it here (AVC at 8428 Kb/s | 1920 x 1080 (1.778) at 23.976 fps) Clip a small size: - and dynamic and static scenes interspersed;...
i7 860 @ 2800 (TurboMode - disable) x264 HD BENCHMARK 4.0 x86 RESULTS (DgIndex v.1.5.8.0) Results for x264.exe r1913_8bit...
dbart read my post http://forums.techarp.com/reviews-articles/26363-x264-hd-benchmark-4-0-a-8.html#post364931?postcount=75 also need...
Progress does not stand still evolving technology, increasing computing power of a PC. In this regard, I propose to replace the encoder used in...
In the test x264 HD BENCHMARK 4.0 using an outdated version of the library DgIndex (DGDecode.dll v.1.5.0.0; 2007). Recommends that you upgrade to...
x264 HD BENCHMARK 4.0 RESULTS Results for x264.exe r1913 ========================== Pass 1 ------ encoded 1442 frames, 110.64 fps,...
Adrian Wong +1 totally agree with you.
Yes, I think it's time to make two separate branches of the test for 32-bit version of the codec, and 64-bit version.:think:
x264 HD BENCHMARK 3.0 RESULTS Results for x264.exe r1342 -------------------------- encoded 1442 frames, 64.44 fps, 3899.02 kb/s encoded...
Results for x264.exe r1342 -------------------------- encoded 1442 frames, 17.96 fps, 3899.26 kb/s encoded 1442 frames, 18.92 fps, 3899.26...
Separate names with a comma.
