Defragmenters! Which do you recommend?

Discussion in 'General Software' started by zy, Sep 24, 2005.


Which Disk Degragmenter?

  1. Windows Built-In

    0 vote(s)
  2. Diskeeper

    0 vote(s)
  3. PerfectDisk

    0 vote(s)
  4. SpeedDisk

    0 vote(s)
  5. Others

    0 vote(s)
  6. dont defrag :P

    0 vote(s)
Multiple votes are allowed.
  1. ChampionLLY

    ChampionLLY News Writer

    SSD era, death for defraggers?
  2. Adrian Wong

    Adrian Wong Da Boss Staff Member

    Well, the platters are spinning all the time... Head overuse may be a problem but only if you defrag very often, like several times a day.

    If you only defrag a few times a month.. or even once a month, this is unlikely to be a problem. Unless you overdo it, the benefits of defragging a hard drive far outweigh any potential reduction in HDD lifespan.
  3. Adrian Wong

    Adrian Wong Da Boss Staff Member

    Hehe.. Yeah, but it will be quite sometime before solid state drives become common. :D
  4. Max_87

    Max_87 huehuehue

    I can't remember when was the last time I defrag my HDDs :lol:
  5. Zenphic

    Zenphic Newbie

    Agreed. Defragging really helps when you want to read/write on a HDD with lots of datas. :thumb:
  6. Chai

    Chai Administrator Staff Member

    If you *ahem* run P2P alot, your HDD will require defragging very often.
  7. Lacus

    Lacus Newbie

    hmm, does actually using a lot of p2p actually harms the hdd and also slows it down? I used to use Diskeeper but later on changed to some freeware Auslogic disc defrag. Seems ok imo.
  8. lee_what2004

    lee_what2004 Just Started

    harming shouldn't be as the disk is spinning all the time,
    it could slow down the performance as read/write is working all the time.

    as for now, I'm using UltimateDefrag :)
  9. Rotarizer

    Rotarizer Newbie


    When a HDD is turned on, the platters will spin all the time, regardless of whether the drive is in 'use' or not. The notable exception is with hybrid drives where unless non-cached data is needed, the platters are static, AFAIK. Because of this, hybrid drives are also very slow when accessing non-cached data because the platters have to spin up from stop.

    As for defragging, if it is done regularly, then the overall level of fragmentation is low, and every successive defrag run lasts generally only a short time.

    Take a good automatic defragger for instance. Since it runs in the background using I/O sensing, it keeps the drives optimized when necessary and when it has idle resources to tap into. After initial processing of the drive, it kicks in for merely a few minutes a day for typical usage. It does it automatically, so there is no prior planning required for off-peak times unlike with older scheduled defragmentation, saving the user/admin some time and effort.

    Also, defrag is just another drive operation, no more harmful than P2P or watching a movie off the HDD, AFAIK.
    1 person likes this.
  10. Zenphic

    Zenphic Newbie

    Kewl, I used to use the trial of UltimateDefrag, but then I didn't want to purchase it and switched to JkDefrag :mrgreen:
  11. eXPeri3nc3

    eXPeri3nc3 Newbie

    My vote goes to Disk Keeper. Serves me well so far.
  12. Adrian Wong

    Adrian Wong Da Boss Staff Member

    Excellent reply! +rep! :thumb:
  13. graysky

    graysky ARP Reviewer

    I didn't see JKDefrag in the list. It is my all time favorite defrag program due to its power and small footprint (it's also opensource).

    Have a look at it at the homepage (also download the 64-bit version is need be):

    JkDefrag v3.34
  14. Mac Daddy

    Mac Daddy Pickin' Da Gitfiddle

    Haven't tried it Graysky but will give the 64 bit version a shot on my new Vista Ultimate X64 install .. Cheers :thumb:
  15. Zenphic

    Zenphic Newbie

    It's a really good software. I use it myself.
    The GUI is really bare though. You might or might not like that, but you can find some GUIs made by other people at the bottom of the JkDefrag homepage. :thumb:
  16. Mac Daddy

    Mac Daddy Pickin' Da Gitfiddle

    Cheers on the heads up from both of you if its open source I will prolly like it :thumb:
  17. hjlavery

    hjlavery Newbie

    I had thought that drive spin down was a function of the controller chip, which is why cheap raid cards can decrease the life of hard drives... I could be wrong though.... :think:
  18. Rotarizer

    Rotarizer Newbie

    Thanks! Appreciate it.:beer:
  19. Rotarizer

    Rotarizer Newbie

    I've never used RAID, so I don't know about that point.
    From what I understand, the greatest wear and tear on a drive platter is whenever it spins up or spins down. Also, the power consumption is supposed to be maximum during this operation.

    Interesting, some of the more pricey laptops come with HDD shock-protection systems where the heads are parked in a 'safe' position away from the drive platter surface as soon as the built-in accelerometer detects sudden acceleration. I don't know if the platters spin down too, but I would guess not.

    There is a general misconception that the HDD works like an old record player, but the read/write head actually floats a few nanometers or microns above the platter surface and never comes in contact with the magnetic media. Well, for any reason, if it buries itself on the platter, then you can kiss the HDD goodbye:mrgreen: because the magnetic media is only a thin film on the platter substrate, and any physical contact with the head will irreparably damage it.
  20. Adrian Wong

    Adrian Wong Da Boss Staff Member

    Current drive technology have "hardened" the media substrate so they can withstand some amount of head crashes. Still, you do NOT want to shake the hard disk drive while it's running!! :mrgreen:

Share This Page