x264 Benchmark

Discussion in 'Reviews & Articles' started by Dashken, Sep 9, 2007.

  1. BillyBuerger

    BillyBuerger Newbie

    Sun Ultra 40 Workstation
    Opteron 280 (Dual) 2.4GHz
    12x200
    nVidia nForce4
    3,3,3,8 @200MHz
    Windows Server 2003 R2 Enterprise


    ---------- RUN1PASS1.LOG
    encoded 1749 frames, 121.81 fps, 1850.94 kb/s

    ---------- RUN2PASS1.LOG
    encoded 1749 frames, 122.07 fps, 1850.94 kb/s

    ---------- RUN3PASS1.LOG
    encoded 1749 frames, 122.07 fps, 1850.94 kb/s

    ---------- RUN4PASS1.LOG
    encoded 1749 frames, 122.07 fps, 1850.94 kb/s

    ---------- RUN5PASS1.LOG
    encoded 1749 frames, 121.94 fps, 1850.94 kb/s

    ---------- RUN1PASS2.LOG
    encoded 1749 frames, 31.75 fps, 1829.46 kb/s

    ---------- RUN2PASS2.LOG
    encoded 1749 frames, 31.82 fps, 1829.33 kb/s

    ---------- RUN3PASS2.LOG
    encoded 1749 frames, 31.79 fps, 1829.10 kb/s

    ---------- RUN4PASS2.LOG
    encoded 1749 frames, 31.75 fps, 1829.41 kb/s

    ---------- RUN5PASS2.LOG
    encoded 1749 frames, 31.67 fps, 1829.16 kb/s
     
  2. ThomasB

    ThomasB Newbie

    Specs:
    Celeron M 350 Dothan
    13x100
    Via PM880
    2.5-3-3-7 @ 166 MHz
    XP Home SP2

    Results:
    ---------- RUN1PASS1.LOG
    encoded 1749 frames, 16.04 fps, 1854.10 kb/s

    ---------- RUN2PASS1.LOG
    encoded 1749 frames, 16.12 fps, 1854.10 kb/s

    ---------- RUN3PASS1.LOG
    encoded 1749 frames, 16.14 fps, 1854.10 kb/s

    ---------- RUN4PASS1.LOG
    encoded 1749 frames, 16.16 fps, 1854.10 kb/s

    ---------- RUN5PASS1.LOG
    encoded 1749 frames, 16.19 fps, 1854.10 kb/s

    ---------- RUN1PASS2.LOG
    encoded 1749 frames, 3.91 fps, 1825.89 kb/s

    ---------- RUN2PASS2.LOG
    encoded 1749 frames, 3.92 fps, 1825.89 kb/s

    ---------- RUN3PASS2.LOG
    encoded 1749 frames, 3.94 fps, 1825.89 kb/s

    ---------- RUN4PASS2.LOG
    encoded 1749 frames, 3.84 fps, 1825.89 kb/s

    ---------- RUN5PASS2.LOG
    encoded 1749 frames, 3.93 fps, 1825.89 kb/s
     
    Last edited: Jan 12, 2008
  3. kpfong

    kpfong Newbie

    Dell Optiplex 755
    CPU:Core 2 Quad Q6700 10x266MHz
    Chipset: Q35
    Memory: 6-6-6-18@400MHz
    OS: WinXP Pro SP2



    ---------- RUN1PASS1.LOG
    encoded 1749 frames, 137.85 fps, 1850.94 kb/s

    ---------- RUN2PASS1.LOG
    encoded 1749 frames, 138.53 fps, 1850.94 kb/s

    ---------- RUN3PASS1.LOG
    encoded 1749 frames, 138.71 fps, 1850.94 kb/s

    ---------- RUN4PASS1.LOG
    encoded 1749 frames, 138.89 fps, 1850.94 kb/s

    ---------- RUN5PASS1.LOG
    encoded 1749 frames, 139.13 fps, 1850.94 kb/s

    ---------- RUN1PASS2.LOG
    encoded 1749 frames, 37.55 fps, 1829.28 kb/s

    ---------- RUN2PASS2.LOG
    encoded 1749 frames, 37.56 fps, 1829.13 kb/s

    ---------- RUN3PASS2.LOG
    encoded 1749 frames, 37.59 fps, 1829.26 kb/s

    ---------- RUN4PASS2.LOG
    encoded 1749 frames, 37.56 fps, 1829.11 kb/s

    ---------- RUN5PASS2.LOG
    encoded 1749 frames, 37.65 fps, 1829.25 kb/s
     
    Last edited: Jan 18, 2008
  4. hkazemi

    hkazemi Newbie

    making the full set of data available?

    Graysky, could you make the full spreadsheet/database of all the submitted values available online somewhere, possibly as a downloadable text-based file or .XLS ? The submitted graphic - based tables are great, but I'd like to be able to access the full set of data in an editable/sortable document too.

    Also, the main benchmark page, www techarp com showarticle.aspx?artno=442 (can't post urls yet), has a Revision History section at the bottom. You may want to update that when you update the charts.

    Finally, the DGDECODE.DLL included in your zip file is version 1.4.9 beta 17, whereas there is currently a final version of 1.4.9 on neuron2's website, and 1.5.0 is at rc2. People who are running different versions of DGDECODE.DLL may see slightly different test results due to variations in DGDECODE performance. For my tests (submitted below), I replaced my newer DGDECODE.DLL with the version you included and made sure I was on Avisynth 2.5.7.

    Thanks!
     
  5. hkazemi

    hkazemi Newbie

    IBM Thinkpad T23 2647-5RU, 1.2 ghz
    Intel Pentium III-M Tualatin, 9.0 x 133.2 MHz, Intel i830MP rev. A4, default memory timings (unknown), XP Pro SP2

    ---------- RUN1PASS1.LOG
    encoded 1749 frames, 11.25 fps, 1854.10 kb/s

    ---------- RUN2PASS1.LOG
    encoded 1749 frames, 11.23 fps, 1854.10 kb/s

    ---------- RUN3PASS1.LOG
    encoded 1749 frames, 10.35 fps, 1854.10 kb/s

    ---------- RUN4PASS1.LOG
    encoded 1749 frames, 11.13 fps, 1854.10 kb/s

    ---------- RUN5PASS1.LOG
    encoded 1749 frames, 11.12 fps, 1854.10 kb/s

    ---------- RUN1PASS2.LOG
    encoded 1749 frames, 2.89 fps, 1825.89 kb/s

    ---------- RUN2PASS2.LOG
    encoded 1749 frames, 2.92 fps, 1825.89 kb/s

    ---------- RUN3PASS2.LOG
    encoded 1749 frames, 2.90 fps, 1825.89 kb/s

    ---------- RUN4PASS2.LOG
    encoded 1749 frames, 2.91 fps, 1825.89 kb/s

    ---------- RUN5PASS2.LOG
    encoded 1749 frames, 2.91 fps, 1825.89 kb/s
     
  6. hkazemi

    hkazemi Newbie

    AMD Athlon 64 3700+ San Diego, 11.0 x 200.9 MHz, NVIDIA nForce4 rev. A3, 2-3-2-8 @ 200.9 MHz, XP Pro SP2

    ---------- RUN1PASS1.LOG
    encoded 1749 frames, 29.74 fps, 1854.10 kb/s

    ---------- RUN2PASS1.LOG
    encoded 1749 frames, 30.27 fps, 1854.10 kb/s

    ---------- RUN3PASS1.LOG
    encoded 1749 frames, 30.25 fps, 1854.10 kb/s

    ---------- RUN4PASS1.LOG
    encoded 1749 frames, 30.25 fps, 1854.10 kb/s

    ---------- RUN5PASS1.LOG
    encoded 1749 frames, 30.24 fps, 1854.10 kb/s

    ---------- RUN1PASS2.LOG
    encoded 1749 frames, 7.26 fps, 1825.89 kb/s

    ---------- RUN2PASS2.LOG
    encoded 1749 frames, 7.26 fps, 1825.89 kb/s

    ---------- RUN3PASS2.LOG
    encoded 1749 frames, 7.26 fps, 1825.89 kb/s

    ---------- RUN4PASS2.LOG
    encoded 1749 frames, 7.26 fps, 1825.89 kb/s

    ---------- RUN5PASS2.LOG
    encoded 1749 frames, 7.26 fps, 1825.89 kb/s
     
  7. hkazemi

    hkazemi Newbie

    Intel Pentium III Katmai, 5.5 x 99.7 MHz x 2 (i.e. two 550 Mhz cpus), ServerWorks NB6635 rev. 04, default memory timings (unknown), Windows Server 2003 Enterprise Edition Eval

    ---------- RUN1PASS1.LOG
    encoded 1749 frames, 7.70 fps, 1850.89 kb/s

    ---------- RUN2PASS1.LOG
    encoded 1749 frames, 7.78 fps, 1850.89 kb/s

    ---------- RUN3PASS1.LOG
    encoded 1749 frames, 7.84 fps, 1850.89 kb/s

    ---------- RUN4PASS1.LOG
    encoded 1749 frames, 7.83 fps, 1850.89 kb/s

    ---------- RUN5PASS1.LOG
    encoded 1749 frames, 7.60 fps, 1850.89 kb/s

    ---------- RUN1PASS2.LOG
    encoded 1749 frames, 2.12 fps, 1826.37 kb/s

    ---------- RUN2PASS2.LOG
    encoded 1749 frames, 2.13 fps, 1826.37 kb/s

    ---------- RUN3PASS2.LOG
    encoded 1749 frames, 2.13 fps, 1826.37 kb/s

    ---------- RUN4PASS2.LOG
    encoded 1749 frames, 2.11 fps, 1826.37 kb/s

    ---------- RUN5PASS2.LOG
    encoded 1749 frames, 2.04 fps, 1826.38 kb/s
     
    Last edited: Jan 18, 2008
  8. hkazemi

    hkazemi Newbie

    ABIT KG7 motherboard, Athlon 1.4 GHz Thunderbird, 512 mb SDR ram
    AMD Athlon Thunderbird, 10.5 x 133.5 MHz, AMD AMD-761 rev. A3, 2.5-3-3-6 @ 133.5, XP Pro SP2

    ---------- RUN1PASS1.LOG
    encoded 1749 frames, 14.45 fps, 1854.10 kb/s

    ---------- RUN2PASS1.LOG
    encoded 1749 frames, 14.25 fps, 1854.10 kb/s

    ---------- RUN3PASS1.LOG
    encoded 1749 frames, 14.22 fps, 1854.10 kb/s

    ---------- RUN4PASS1.LOG
    encoded 1749 frames, 14.24 fps, 1854.10 kb/s

    ---------- RUN5PASS1.LOG
    encoded 1749 frames, 14.22 fps, 1854.10 kb/s

    ---------- RUN1PASS2.LOG
    encoded 1749 frames, 3.60 fps, 1825.89 kb/s

    ---------- RUN2PASS2.LOG
    encoded 1749 frames, 3.52 fps, 1825.89 kb/s

    ---------- RUN3PASS2.LOG
    encoded 1749 frames, 3.54 fps, 1825.89 kb/s

    ---------- RUN4PASS2.LOG
    encoded 1749 frames, 3.54 fps, 1825.89 kb/s

    ---------- RUN5PASS2.LOG
    encoded 1749 frames, 3.53 fps, 1825.89 kb/s
     
  9. kpfong

    kpfong Newbie

    CPU: Phenom 9500 11x 200MHz
    Chipset: RD790
    RAM: 5-5-5-18@400MHz
    OS: WinXP Home SP 2

    TLB off:


    ---------- RUN1PASS1.LOG
    encoded 1749 frames, 119.59 fps, 1850.94 kb/s

    ---------- RUN2PASS1.LOG
    encoded 1749 frames, 119.08 fps, 1850.94 kb/s

    ---------- RUN3PASS1.LOG
    encoded 1749 frames, 120.23 fps, 1850.94 kb/s

    ---------- RUN4PASS1.LOG
    encoded 1749 frames, 119.84 fps, 1850.94 kb/s

    ---------- RUN5PASS1.LOG
    encoded 1749 frames, 120.11 fps, 1850.94 kb/s

    ---------- RUN1PASS2.LOG
    encoded 1749 frames, 30.56 fps, 1829.43 kb/s

    ---------- RUN2PASS2.LOG
    encoded 1749 frames, 30.66 fps, 1829.09 kb/s

    ---------- RUN3PASS2.LOG
    encoded 1749 frames, 30.61 fps, 1829.29 kb/s

    ---------- RUN4PASS2.LOG
    encoded 1749 frames, 30.57 fps, 1829.22 kb/s

    ---------- RUN5PASS2.LOG
    encoded 1749 frames, 30.58 fps, 1829.11 kb/s

    TLB on:

    ---------- RUN1PASS1.LOG
    encoded 1749 frames, 121.93 fps, 1850.94 kb/s

    ---------- RUN2PASS1.LOG
    encoded 1749 frames, 121.81 fps, 1850.94 kb/s

    ---------- RUN3PASS1.LOG
    encoded 1749 frames, 122.46 fps, 1850.94 kb/s

    ---------- RUN4PASS1.LOG
    encoded 1749 frames, 121.67 fps, 1850.94 kb/s

    ---------- RUN5PASS1.LOG
    encoded 1749 frames, 121.94 fps, 1850.94 kb/s

    ---------- RUN1PASS2.LOG
    encoded 1749 frames, 30.96 fps, 1829.24 kb/s

    ---------- RUN2PASS2.LOG
    encoded 1749 frames, 31.06 fps, 1829.26 kb/s

    ---------- RUN3PASS2.LOG
    encoded 1749 frames, 30.95 fps, 1829.19 kb/s

    ---------- RUN4PASS2.LOG
    encoded 1749 frames, 31.02 fps, 1829.38 kb/s

    ---------- RUN5PASS2.LOG
    encoded 1749 frames, 30.99 fps, 1829.42 kb/s
     
    Last edited: Jan 18, 2008
  10. Adrian Wong

    Adrian Wong Da Boss Staff Member

    We are working on a database-based system for comparison. It's taking time though...
     
  11. kpfong

    kpfong Newbie

    Athlon 64 3200+ ClawHammer, 10x199.5MHz, Nvidia NForce3 150, [email protected], XP Pro SP2


    ---------- RUN1PASS1.LOG
    encoded 1749 frames, 27.50 fps, 1854.10 kb/s

    ---------- RUN2PASS1.LOG
    encoded 1749 frames, 27.42 fps, 1854.10 kb/s

    ---------- RUN3PASS1.LOG
    encoded 1749 frames, 27.46 fps, 1854.10 kb/s

    ---------- RUN4PASS1.LOG
    encoded 1749 frames, 27.50 fps, 1854.10 kb/s

    ---------- RUN5PASS1.LOG
    encoded 1749 frames, 27.48 fps, 1854.10 kb/s

    ---------- RUN1PASS2.LOG
    encoded 1749 frames, 6.64 fps, 1825.89 kb/s

    ---------- RUN2PASS2.LOG
    encoded 1749 frames, 6.63 fps, 1825.89 kb/s

    ---------- RUN3PASS2.LOG
    encoded 1749 frames, 6.63 fps, 1825.89 kb/s

    ---------- RUN4PASS2.LOG
    encoded 1749 frames, 6.64 fps, 1825.89 kb/s
     
  12. alom

    alom Newbie

    the link isn't work now. where can i get the fiel of x264 Benchmark?
     
  13. Adrian Wong

    Adrian Wong Da Boss Staff Member

    What do you mean the link isn't working? :think:

    You can download it here - Tech ARP - x264 Benchmark
     
  14. Heaven

    Heaven Newbie

    Hi to all!
    Here are my results:

    Amd Athlon 64 X2 5600+ Windsor, 14x200MHz, nVidia MCP61, 5-5-5-18-24@400MHz, XP Pro Sp2

    http://img407.imageshack.us/img407/2594/71250021cw5.png
    http://img297.imageshack.us/img297/1518/25400943yh9.png
    http://img297.imageshack.us/img297/9292/94651062cx5.png



    ---------- RUN1PASS1.LOG
    encoded 1749 frames, 76.46 fps, 1850.89 kb/s

    ---------- RUN2PASS1.LOG
    encoded 1749 frames, 76.41 fps, 1850.89 kb/s

    ---------- RUN3PASS1.LOG
    encoded 1749 frames, 76.46 fps, 1850.89 kb/s

    ---------- RUN4PASS1.LOG
    encoded 1749 frames, 76.62 fps, 1850.89 kb/s

    ---------- RUN5PASS1.LOG
    encoded 1749 frames, 76.62 fps, 1850.89 kb/s

    ---------- RUN1PASS2.LOG
    encoded 1749 frames, 18.54 fps, 1826.37 kb/s

    ---------- RUN2PASS2.LOG
    encoded 1749 frames, 18.52 fps, 1826.32 kb/s

    ---------- RUN3PASS2.LOG
    encoded 1749 frames, 18.52 fps, 1826.37 kb/s

    ---------- RUN4PASS2.LOG
    encoded 1749 frames, 18.53 fps, 1826.37 kb/s

    ---------- RUN5PASS2.LOG
    encoded 1749 frames, 18.53 fps, 1826.38 kb/s
     
    Last edited: Jan 21, 2008
  15. kpfong

    kpfong Newbie

    Intel Pentium M 730 Dothan, 12 x 133MHz, i915GM, 3-3-3-9@200MHz, XP Tablet PC SP2


    ---------- RUN1PASS1.LOG
    encoded 1749 frames, 20.41 fps, 1854.10 kb/s

    ---------- RUN2PASS1.LOG
    encoded 1749 frames, 20.37 fps, 1854.10 kb/s

    ---------- RUN3PASS1.LOG
    encoded 1749 frames, 20.40 fps, 1854.10 kb/s

    ---------- RUN4PASS1.LOG
    encoded 1749 frames, 20.28 fps, 1854.10 kb/s

    ---------- RUN5PASS1.LOG
    encoded 1749 frames, 20.38 fps, 1854.10 kb/s

    ---------- RUN1PASS2.LOG
    encoded 1749 frames, 5.05 fps, 1825.89 kb/s

    ---------- RUN2PASS2.LOG
    encoded 1749 frames, 5.02 fps, 1825.89 kb/s

    ---------- RUN3PASS2.LOG
    encoded 1749 frames, 5.02 fps, 1825.89 kb/s

    ---------- RUN4PASS2.LOG
    encoded 1749 frames, 4.98 fps, 1825.89 kb/s

    ---------- RUN5PASS2.LOG
    encoded 1749 frames, 5.02 fps, 1825.89 kb/s
     
  16. graysky

    graysky ARP Reviewer

    Thanks for all the data, guys. I need to spend a few hours updating the table (it is REALLY labor intensive at this point given the size of it and the fact that I'm using screenshots to capture it).

    Once TA upgrades the backend, it'll be much easier :)
     
  17. graysky

    graysky ARP Reviewer

    Oh, btw, Kris over at anandtech.com used my benchmark in his overclocking qx9650 guide which is pretty flattering.

    Have a look.
     
  18. Chai

    Chai Administrator Staff Member

    Yup I saw that too. :thumb:
     
  19. Adrian Wong

    Adrian Wong Da Boss Staff Member

    We are using it in our current and future CPU tests too. More coming up! :D

    Oh yeah, I have some benchmark results (averaged) for you :

    Core 2 Extreme QX6700 (Pass 1) 134.1
    Core 2 Extreme QX6700 (Pass 2) 37.2
    Core 2 Quad Q6600 (Pass 1) 128.3
    Core 2 Quad Q6600 (Pass 2) 35.5
    Core 2 Duo E6600 (Pass 1) 68.7
    Core 2 Duo E6600 (Pass 2) 16.9
    Core 2 Duo E6320 (Pass 1) 54.8
    Core 2 Duo E6320 (Pass 2) 13.3
     
  20. hkazemi

    hkazemi Newbie

    data table inconsistency for an Intel Q9450 or Q9550

    I found an inconsistency in the data table for an entry labeled Core 2 Quad Q9550 ES. The problem has to do with the listed multiplier. It is listed as 8x333 for 2.66 ghz.

    The problem is that isn't the right multiplier for a Q9550; it is correct for a Q9450 at stock speeds.

    Q9450 is 8.0 x 333 for 2.66 ghz
    Q9550 is 8.5 x 333 for 2.83 ghz

    This can be seen various places on the web, including the tables here:
    List of future Intel Core 2 microprocessors - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

    Both the stock speed table and the Intel OC table show this entry.

    I think most likely the chip is a Q9450 not a Q9550.
     

Share This Page